Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOODING soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOODING, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOODING were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOODING soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOODING series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOODING share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOODING, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GOODING as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Succor-Gooding-Deshler complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes16615169486031j9rfid67519921:24000
Gooding-Gariper loams, 2 to 20 percent slopes6313057486238j9z3id67519921:24000
Gooding-Gooding, eroded-Hamrub complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes4320233793292nk0id68019851:24000
Adios-Gooding-Bostrum complex, 4 to 20 percent slopes24937793032nj5id68019851:24000
Rehfield-Gooding complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes964475793872nlwid68019851:24000
Gooding-McHandy-Power complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes7313200821262rg7id68119931:24000
Gooding silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes6910440821212rg2id68119931:24000
Catchell-Gooding complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes278375819602r8wid68119931:24000
Gooding-Catchell complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes707105821232rg4id68119931:24000
Gooding-Power complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes745480821272rg8id68119931:24000
Gooding-Marley-Hobby complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes725450821252rg6id68119931:24000
Gooding-Elijah complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes712250821242rg5id68119931:24000
Elijah-Gooding complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes472075820312rc5id68119931:24000
Catchell-Gooding complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes281115819612r8xid68119931:24000
Gooding-Connleyhills-Lithgow complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes5038481632708852zgswor62819971:24000
Gooding-Littlegrass complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes3464621325119422q9dror64420211:24000
Gooding-Connleyhills-Lithgow complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes50381645632635422zgswor64420211:24000
Gooding-Perla association, 15 to 60 percent slopes341102424874742phf3or64420211:24000
Succor-Gooding-Deshler complex, 2 to 35 percent slopesID1668823312619j9rfor6451:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOODING soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .