Soil Data Explorer - GOODIN

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOODIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOODIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOODIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
2	40A5465	S1962OR071004	Goodin	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.293335,-123.2569427
2	40A5444	S1962OR071005	Goodin	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.4066658,-123.2852783
2	40A5445	S1962OR071006	Goodin	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.3488884,-123.2838898
2	09N0800	S2008OR053001	Goodin	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.9542503,-123.2948608

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOODIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOODIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOODIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOODIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GOODIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Goodin-Dupee-Chehulpum complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes	73	666	610186	ngyf	or003	2004	1:24000
Goodin-Dupee-Chehulpum complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	72	423	610185	ngyd	or003	2004	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2790D	74	2711122	1jrw8	or067	1975	1:20000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	2789C	34	2711121	1jrw1	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2790F	26	2711124	1jrwb	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2790E	25	2711123	1jrw9	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2770D	18	2711113	1j8cj	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2770E	17	2711114	1j8ck	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2770F	8	2711115	1j8cl	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes	2770C	7	2711112	1j8ch	or067	1975	1:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2790D	5955	2731438	1jrw8	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2790E	5059	2711283	1jrw9	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2770F	3787	2711275	1j8cl	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	2789C	2886	2711334	1jrw1	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2770E	2485	2731451	1j8ck	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2767D	1901	2711382	1j8cc	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2790F	1742	2711368	1jrwb	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin silty clay loam, 2 to 12 percent slopes	2766C	1711	2711320	1j8cb	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2770D	1711	2711348	1j8cj	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	2766D	1206	2711324	1vkrc	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2767E	1187	2711294	1j8cd	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Dupee-Chehulpum complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	2765C	1080	2711392	1j8c8	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Dupee-Chehulpum complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	2765D	803	2711307	1j8c9	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes	2771E	596	2711384	1j8cm	or071	1967	1:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes	2770C	517	2711282	1j8ch	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin silty clay loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes	2766E	266	2731447	2lkgy	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2767F	226	2711358	1j8cf	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Witham complex, hummocky, 2 to 25 percent slopes	2808D	175	2711335	2q3kr	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin-Witham complex, hummocky, 2 to 25 percent, stony	2818E	121	2731452	2q3kn	or071	1967	1:24000
Goodin silty clay loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	2766F	38	2711394	2p8wk	or071	1967	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOODIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).