Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOLDFLINT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOLDFLINT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOLDFLINT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOLDFLINT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOLDFLINT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOLDFLINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOLDFLINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOLDFLINT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOLDFLINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOLDFLINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOLDFLINT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GOLDFLINT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kurrie-Goldflint-Warwood families, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges75GD2282185961220f2hmt60520071:24000
Stecum-Goldflint-Branham complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes335E13516975471tzflmt61620031:24000
Comad-Goldflint-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes364F9216975461tzfkmt61620031:24000
Kurrie-Goldflint-Warwood families, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges75GD23065714952250l9mt63520061:24000
Goldflint family-Rock outcrop-Ovando family, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges75GD42646914952350lbmt63520061:24000
Ovando-Goldflint-Blackleed families, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges75GD11020514952150l8mt63520061:24000
Stecum-Rock outcrop-Goldflint complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes365F40117031531v58fmt63520061:24000
Comad-Goldflint-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes364F23617031521v58dmt63520061:24000
Stecum-Goldflint-Branham complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes335E16017031461v586mt63520061:24000
Rock outcrop-Goldflint-Rubble land complex, 45 to 80 percent slopes361G14017031491v589mt63520061:24000
Stecum-Goldflint-Basincreek complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stony415F7717031661v58vmt63520061:24000
Bobowic-Goldflint complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes332D2917031441v584mt63520061:24000
Stecum-Goldflint-Branham complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes335E2269362258d4yrmt67020071:24000
Comad-Goldflint-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes364F1095362395d535mt67020071:24000
Stecum-Rock outcrop-Goldflint complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes365F1034362397d537mt67020071:24000
Stecum-Goldflint-Basincreek complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stony415F870114746217j0xmt67020071:24000
Rock outcrop-Goldflint-Rubble land complex, 45 to 80 percent slopes361G609362396d536mt67020071:24000
Bobowic-Goldflint complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes332D337362401d53cmt67020071:24000
Wesdy family-Mollic Haplocryalfs-Goldflint family, complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes40478861520285364wy66320121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOLDFLINT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .