Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GILMORE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GILMORE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GILMORE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GILMORE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GILMORE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GILMORE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GILMORE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GILMORE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GILMORE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GILMORE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GILMORE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AK-2011-05-27-01 | Fairbanks Area - 1959

    Diagram of a landscape showing relationship of soil series, underlying material, and permafrost. Adapted from Pewe (Soil Survey of Fairbanks Area, Alaska; 1959).

Map Units

Map units containing GILMORE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gilmore silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes1281943692890r809ak61020031:25000
Gilmore-Steese complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes1321620692924r81dak61020031:25000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes1771471692920r818ak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes1291362692891r80bak61020031:25000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes1761301692919r817ak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes1271064692889r808ak61020031:25000
Gilmore-Ester complex, 12 to 70 percent slopes131930692923r81cak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes126725692888r807ak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes130516692892r80cak61020031:25000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes178404692921r819ak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes125293692887r806ak61020031:25000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 45 to 70 percent slopes179122692922r81bak61020031:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 12 to 45 percent slopes112218773517481qv9ak64219901:24000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes13679786517721qw2ak64219901:24000
Ester-Gilmore complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes10665274517421qv3ak64219901:24000
Gilmore-Steese complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes11421995517501qvcak64219901:24000
Gilmore-Ester complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes11313473517491qvbak64219901:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes1113492517471qv8ak64219901:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes110582517461qv7ak64219901:24000
Gilmore and Steese silt loams, 15 to 45 percent slopes82X70573520021r3hak65020061:24000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes441F6293519911r34ak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes45G3814511291q6bak65020061:24000
Gilmore and Steese silt loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes82V3020520031r3jak65020061:24000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes441E2941519921r35ak65020061:24000
Gilmore-Steese complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes4522139510981q5bak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, subalpine, 15 to 45 percent slopes87X1921520071r3nak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes45F1804510751q4lak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes45E1530510741q4kak65020061:24000
Gilmore, subalpine and Manchu soils, 0 to 15 percent slopes87V1388520081r3pak65020061:24000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes441D771511231q64ak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes45D729510731q4jak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes45C384510721q4hak65020061:24000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 45 to 70 percent slopes441G92511241q65ak65020061:24000
Gilmore silt loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes31GL052542202558425zsfak65520071:25000
Gilmore silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes31GL011290202558025zs9ak65520071:25000
Steese-Gilmore complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes31ST07608202561125zt9ak65520071:25000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GILMORE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .