Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GESSIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GESSIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GESSIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
111AHM72011972IN057001Gessie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.0074889,-86.0288861
111AMN72011972IN097001Gessie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.6893278,-86.2288194
111A01N0842S2001OH129001Gessie6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5806847,-82.9712143
111DCS76041976IN017004Gessie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7283056,-86.5085611
111D04N1163S2004IN103001Gessie6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.755806,-86.0228577
114BFR81051981IN047005Gessie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.4513639,-85.151925
n/a92P0249S1991OH131107Gessie6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GESSIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GESSIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GESSIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GESSIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GESSIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GESSIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GESSIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GESSIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IN-2010-09-24-17 | Owen County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent materials in the Stonelick-Gessie-McAdoo association (Soil Survey of Owen County, Indiana).

  2. IN-2010-09-24-18 | Owen County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent materials in the Alvin-Princeton-Bloomfield and Stonelick-Gessie-McAdoo associations (Soil Survey of Owen County, Indiana).

Map Units

Map units containing GESSIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gessie-Eel silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationGlnAH12511648505jjrin03519971:12000
Gessie loam, sandy substratum, occasionally floodedGe49881622825fvxin04719841:15840
Gessie loam, sandy substratum, rarely floodedGd13091622815fvwin04719841:15840
Gessie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationGe306031866642w55win05719761:15840
Gessie silt loam-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationYgbAH12131050952w57tin05719761:15840
Urban land-Gessie silt loam complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationUgbAH1531050942y47min05719761:15840
Gessie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationGe6132913452w55win09519651:15840
Gessie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationGe69741644242w55win09719751:15840
Gessie silt loam-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationYgbAH277231046882w57tin09719751:15840
Urban land-Gessie silt loam complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationUgbAH97031046872y47min09719751:15840
Gessie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGe66051619612zy60in10319771:20000
Gessie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, brief durationGblAH17871660035kqyin11919971:12000
Gessie loam, frequently floodedGe27621700865pznoh00119871:15840
Gessie loam, frequently floodedGn1015857681q73toh01519871:15840
Gessie silt loam, frequently floodedGg18411722605s7soh04519981:12000
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGf17481722595s7roh04519981:12000
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGo4190758822103oh04719681:15840
Gessie loam, frequently floodedGd7714206661jp9yoh07119731:15840
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGe814205561jp6doh07119731:15840
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGs4814030751j30hoh12919771:15840
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGf7216890001tpjwoh13119841:15840
Gessie silt loam, occasionally floodedGe179141708755qt3oh14119971:15840
Gessie silt loam, frequently floodedGf56011708765qt4oh14119971:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GESSIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .