Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GEROW soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GEROW, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GEROW were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GEROW soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GEROW series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GEROW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GEROW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GEROW share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GEROW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GEROW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GEROW, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GEROW as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Luckycreek-Gerow complex, rarely flooded, 0 to 20 percent slopes1757348342608325xt7or6181:24000
Silvies-Gerow complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes420378434260892ml2or6181:24000
Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes440302734260822ml5or6181:24000
Gerow-Utley complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes370213534263172lp44or6181:24000
Mulvahill-Gerow-Silvies complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes494145234374942xfv0or6181:24000
Silvies-Peaviner, moderately well drained-Gerow complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesM15135234374731qw84or6181:24000
Gerow ashy silty clay loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes29013353437471tgc1or6181:24000
Gerow ashy silt loam, drained, 1 to 5 percent slopes430113634374472mlyor6181:24000
Gerow-Longbarn complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes16997034261262l9ybor6181:24000
Utley-Gerow complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes37186234294502lp45or6181:24000
Kidnapspring-Gerow complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes0083AW6133434684130ycor6181:24000
Peaviner-Gerow-Norwat complex, 0 to 12 percent slopesM439634347302ydxcor6181:24000
Gerow-Norwat complex, 0 to 12 percent slopesM1730834347991qvrror6181:24000
Normauk-Melloe-Gerow complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesN78529734347961qkk0or6181:24000
Luckycreek-Gerow complex, rarely flooded, 0 to 20 percent slopes175m22346253325xt7or62019921:24000
Silvies-Gerow complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes4073AW517533853532ml2or62620181:24000
Hondu-Gutridge-Gerow complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1358AW476733853052tz1dor62620181:24000
Gerow-Silvies-Luckybutte, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes0096AW26223385261p160or62620181:24000
Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes0093AW226333854722ml5or62620181:24000
Silvies-Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes0109AW86133853012m7gjor62620181:24000
Bigcow-Limberjim-Gerow complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4227AW75833853832tz1kor62620181:24000
Gerow-Utley complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes0135AW66633853022lp44or62620181:24000
Gerow mucky peat, 0 to 1 percent slopes0107AW1813385299p164or62620181:24000
Silvies-Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes270A1245334250792m7gjor6271:24000
Silvies-Gerow complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes4201178234250582ml2or6271:24000
Gerow-Silvies-Luckybutte, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes906A56443426246p160or6271:24000
Gerow-Utley complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes370286234263112lp44or6271:24000
Utley-Gerow complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes371169334294462lp45or6271:24000
Gerow-Longbarn complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes16944234251202l9ybor6271:24000
Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes44024434250462ml5or6271:24000
Luckycreek-Gerow complex, rarely flooded, 0 to 20 percent slopes17565342504725xt7or6271:24000
Silvies-Gerow complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes420152534626172ml2or66619701:31680
Kidnapspring-Gerow complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes0083AW133472515130ycor66619701:31680
Luckycreek-Gerow complex, rarely flooded, 0 to 20 percent slopes1751438342191725xt7or6771:24000
Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes440108334219162ml5or6771:24000
Silvies-Gerow complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes420106834219592ml2or6771:24000
Silvies-Gerow-Luckybutte, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes270A53134245042m7gjor6771:24000
Gerow-Longbarn complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes16937034246072l9ybor6771:24000
Silvies-Peaviner, moderately well drained-Gerow complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesM151134376521qw84or6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GEROW soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .