Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GEISERCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GEISERCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GEISERCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GEISERCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GEISERCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GEISERCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GEISERCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GEISERCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GEISERCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GEISERCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GEISERCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GEISERCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, landslide, 0 to 30 percent slopes6125NL303931208022ptgtor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3322AO243331207041sh5yor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, mass failure, 0 to 30 percent slopes3424NM232531207091shrpor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Olot complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes3481BL228231204671r07kor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3305BO188131202811qpxpor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3361BO173431204361r02mor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3424AO93331204572pgn4or60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3305AO60731207821v6byor60720181:24000
Btree-Geisercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3363CO55931202951qxd7or60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Olot complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes3481AL26231204661r07jor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Syrupcreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3461BO23131204591r05cor60720181:24000
Geisercreek ashy silt loam, 15 to 30 percent north slopes3384BO563120190nj2bor60720181:24000
Btree-Geisercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3363CO721731221381qxd7or62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3424AO263031222572pgn4or62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3361BO224131222331r02mor62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, mass failure, 0 to 30 percent slopes3424NM137331224741shrpor62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Syrupcreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3461BO117631222611r05cor62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Olot complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes3481BL59131222681r07kor62620181:24000
Btree-Geisercreek complex, landslide, 30 to 60 percent slope3363CL15031222351r02qor62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Olot complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes3481AL8631222671r07jor62620181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Olot complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3481BL64234298082ktz4or6271:24000
Btree-Geisercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3363CO33634298271qxd7or6271:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3424AO7834298052pgn4or6271:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3344BO3434318621r02mor6271:24000
Geisercreek-Btree-Syrupcreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3461BO3434298071r05cor6271:24000
Geisercreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3322AO209824867121sh5yor63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3305AO149924370861v6byor63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3305BO93424864801qpxpor63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3361BO10024867211r02mor63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3424AO2924867312pgn4or63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Btree complex, mass failure, 0 to 30 percent slopes3424NM424867321shrpor63120181:24000
Geisercreek ashy silt loam, 15 to 30 percent north slopes3384BO32437116nj2bor63120181:24000
Btree-Geisercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3363CO024867221qxd7or63120181:24000
Geisercreek silt loam, 15 to 30 percent north slopes83238848102v7tor67019991:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, landslide, 0 to 30 percent slopes6125NL631225752ygf0wa60319841:24000
Geisercreek-Limberjim complex, landslide, 0 to 30 percent slopes6125NL9131145092ygf0wa71420181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GEISERCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .