Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GATOR soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GATOR, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GATOR were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
155S08_009S1980FL015009Gator3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.033186,-81.5749588
156BS43_0151976-FL085-S43_015Gator3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.1323395,-80.4987106
156BS31_0121982-FL061-S31_012Gator3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.7664776,-80.6959839
156BS31_0161983-FL061-S31_016Gator3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.7782307,-80.7167892

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GATOR soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GATOR series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GATOR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GATOR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GATOR share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GATOR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GATOR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GATOR, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. FL-2011-05-31-07 | Indian River County - 1987

    Typical pattern of soils in the Terra Ceia-Gator-Canova map unit (Soil Survey of Indian River County, Florida; 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing GATOR as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gator muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded7765114733622tzx0fl00919901:24000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes19227914534392tzwzfl01519821:20000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes19461013869132tzwzfl02719861:24000
Hicoria, Riviera, and Gator soils, depressional83340015294501nbj3fl03519911:15840
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes8673014535672tzwzfl04319911:24000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes191238011514192tzwzfl05119861:24000
Denaud-Gator mucks691070115145517n5qfl05119861:24000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes231032014135232tzwzfl05519821:24000
Gator muck4012739756761tdgnfl06119841:20000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes1940514834162tzwzfl07119821:20000
Gator muck, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes14520531029422y9f2fl07119821:20000
Gator and Terra Ceia soils, frequently flooded26837014140691jgg4fl07519901:24000
Chobee-Gator complex, frequently flooded16772014140601jgfvfl07519901:24000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes2720713840952tzwzfl08119811:24000
Gator and Tequesta mucks58446314216061jq98fl08519791:20000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes1854193231302tzwzfl09519861:20000
Floridana and Gator soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes15428631029972y9gbfl11519881:24000
Floridana-Gator soils, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes60222431030152y9gdfl11519881:24000
Gator-Gator, drained mucks, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes17140631029832y9gcfl11519881:24000
Floridana and Gator soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded1665031029962y9gzfl11519881:24000
Gator-Gator, drained mucks, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes629431030182y9htfl11519881:24000
Gator muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded57103673236662tzx0fl11919851:24000
Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes6414013236742tzwzfl11919851:24000
Gator muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded25784015441262tzx0fl12719771:20000
Gator muck, depressional1946015857781q744fl61619931:15840
Gator muck, limestone substratum, depressional5323191245522623fl61820071:15840
Chobee, Winder, Gator soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes221259231029552y9fdfl62119891:24000
Chobee, Winder, Gator soils, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes10644831029562y9fffl62119891:24000
Gator muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded9243349828315h8fl62220231:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GATOR soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .