Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GASIL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GASIL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GASIL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
84B76-OK-48-876-OK095-48-8Gasil4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.1434111,-96.8288194
84B76-OK-48-976-OK095-48-9Gasil4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.15085,-96.8397417
87A82P061582TX289028Gasil7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties31.2555561,-96.2680588

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GASIL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GASIL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GASIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GASIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GASIL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GASIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GASIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GASIL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-04-11 | Robertson County - 2007

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Silstid-Padena-Robco general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Robertson County, Texas; 2007).

  2. TX-2010-11-04-12 | Robertson County - 2007

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Edge-Crockett general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Robertson County, Texas; 2007).

  3. TX-2012-03-21-16 | Johnson County - October 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Crosstell-Gasil-Rader map unit (Soil Survey of Johnson County, TX; 1985).

  4. TX-2012-03-21-31 | Leon County - July 1989

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Crockett-Benchley-Wilson general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Leon County, TX; 1989).

  5. TX-2012-03-21-32 | Leon County - July 1989

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Margie-Jedd-Lexton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Leon County, TX; 1989).

  6. TX-2012-03-21-40 | Madison County - June 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Rader-Gredge-Chazos general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Madison County, TX; 1994).

  7. TX-2012-03-21-42 | Madison County - June 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Crockett-Benchley-Dimebox general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Madison County, TX; 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing GASIL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Konawa and Gasil soils, 5 to 8 percent slopesDh7791382281dtsnok03719521:24000
Konawa and Gasil soils, 3 to 5 percent slopesDf6571382279dtslok03719521:24000
Konawa and Gasil soils, 1 to 3 percent slopesDg1108382280dtsmok03719521:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, cool, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded24227323832872x3v2ok06919761:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely eroded251394638328830c07ok06919761:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, cool, 3 to 5 percent slopes22125463832852wn9lok06919761:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, cool, 1 to 3 percent slopes21124803832842x3v1ok06919761:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes2311983383286dvv2ok06919761:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, cool, 1 to 3 percent slopes3313543839392x3v1ok09919821:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, cool, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded317913839372x3v2ok09919821:24000
Gasil sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, gullied32291383938dwj3ok09919821:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesGaB1555575139m9gwtx00119701:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesGbC106613634442vthctx05119941:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded2994043644772wn9ktx09719731:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes266301364474d787tx09719731:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes2828973644762wn8ntx09719731:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded301867364479d78dtx09719731:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes27764364475d788tx09719731:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes35203613649862wn8ntx12119751:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes3684103649872wn8ptx12119751:24000
Gasil-Urban land complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes372465364988d7sttx12119751:24000
Gasil and Konsil soils, 1 to 5 percent slopes38430364989d7svtx12119751:24000
Gasil-Lamar complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, erodedBcE2304365279d836tx13919621:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedBaC21063652782vv50tx13919621:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesGfB307533753902vthctx16119861:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes347775366670d9k2tx18119771:20000
Gasil soils, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded374791366673d9k5tx18119771:20000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes352155366671d9k3tx18119771:20000
Gasil-Urban land complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes361789366672d9k4tx18119771:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded4184313677552wn9ktx21719751:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes4062583677542wn8ntx21719751:20000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes122173678732wg95tx23119781:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesGfB76563681682wn8ntx25119811:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGfC67293681692wn8ptx25119811:20000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGaB4742368167dc3ctx25119811:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedGfD43253681702wn9mtx25119811:20000
Gasil-Urban land complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesGuD37368171dc3htx25119811:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesGaB115163691372vv4ztx28720021:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesGsB56503690892vthdtx28720021:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaD2272748084t3frtx28720021:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopesGsD2110369090dd24tx28720021:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesGfB200573691952vthctx28919851:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesGfD284369196dd5ktx28919851:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesGfB289583693972vthdtx29319911:24000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesGaB41143702852vthctx31319891:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesGsB223923717152vthdtx39519961:24000
Gasil loamy fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopesGsD32733717162vv51tx39519961:24000
Gasil-Urban land complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesGuC13150372378dhh6tx43919791:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesGfB112473723742wn8ntx43919791:20000
Gasil fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGfC83593723762wn8ptx43919791:20000
Gasil sandy clay loam, graded, 1 to 5 percent slopesGgC1595372377dhh5tx43919791:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GASIL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .