Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GARMON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GARMON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GARMON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12275KY-207-00375KY207 Garmon-OSDGarmon3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0005836,-84.9118576
n/a75KY-217-00175KY-217-001Garmon3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GARMON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GARMON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GARMON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GARMON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GARMON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GARMON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GARMON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GARMON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-09 | Garrard and Lincoln Counties - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Garmon-Frankstown-Carpenter general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Garrard and Lincoln Counties, Kentucky; 2006).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-10 | Garrard and Lincoln Counties - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Pricetown-Teddy-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Garrard and Lincoln Counties, Kentucky; 2006).

  3. KY-2010-09-03-25 | Cumberland County - 1998

    Relationship of the soils in Garmon-Newbern-Carpenter general soil map unit and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

  4. KY-2010-09-03-27 | Cumberland County - 1998

    Typical pattern of the soils in the Huntington-Elk-Nelse-Grigsby and Holston-Monongahela-Waynesboro general soil map units and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

  5. KY-2012-01-26-36 | Boyle and Mercer Counties - April 1983

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Garmon-Carpenter-Vertrees map unit (Soil Survey of Boyle and Mercer Counties, Kentucky; April 1983).

  6. KY-2012-01-27-01 | Bullitt and Spencer Counties - September 1986

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Garmon-Crider general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Bullitt and Spencer Counties, Kentucky; September 1986).

  7. KY-2012-01-27-02 | Bullitt and Spencer Counties - September 1986

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Trappist-Lenberg-Carpenter general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Bullitt and Spencer Counties, Kentucky; September 1986).

  8. KY-2012-01-27-30 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Pricetown-Teddy-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  9. KY-2012-01-27-31 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Lenberg-Garmon-Carpenter general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  10. KY-2012-01-27-32 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Garmon-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  11. KY-2012-01-27-33 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Frederick-Caneyville-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  12. KY-2012-01-27-47 | Clinton County - May 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Garmon-Caneyville-Dewey general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Clinton County, Kentucky; May 1994).

  13. KY-2012-01-30-08 | Green and Taylor Counties - July 1982

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Frederick-Frankstown-Mountview general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Green and Taylor Counties, Kentucky; July 1982).

  14. KY-2012-01-30-10 | Green and Taylor Counties - July 1982

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Garmon-Shelocta-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Green and Taylor Counties, Kentucky; July 1982).

  15. KY-2012-02-01-10 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Carpenter-Garmon-Rohan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  16. KY-2012-02-01-11 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Trappist-Crider-Faywood general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  17. KY-2012-02-01-46 | Pulaski County - December 1974

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 1 (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Kentucky; December 1974).

  18. KY-2012-02-01-49 | Pulaski County - December 1974

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 4 (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Kentucky; December 1974).

  19. KY-2012-02-01-66 | Wayne County - March 1990

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Waynesboro-Garmon general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wayne County, Kentucky; March 1990).

  20. KY-2012-02-01-67 | Wayne County - March 1990

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Frederick-Mountview general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wayne County, Kentucky; March 1990).

  21. KY-2012-02-01-68 | Wayne County - March 1990

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Garmon-Caneyville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wayne County, Kentucky; March 1990).

  22. TN-2010-11-02-03 | Clay County - 2004

    The relatiohship between soils and landscape in the Dellrose-Renox-Barfield and Garmon-Newbern general soil map units (Soil Survey of Clay County, Tennessee; 2004)

  23. TN-2010-11-02-27 | Overton County - 2005

    The relationship of soils and landscapes in the Garmon-Newbern and Christian-Sengtown general soil map units (Soil Survey of Overton County, Tennessee; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing GARMON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Garmon channery silt loam, 20 to 70 percent slopesGaF6395815924951qg3tky00120061:12000
Garmon silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopesGaF72890548896lf5bky04519891:20000
Garmon-Caneyville association, very steepGcF23364551418lhspky05319901:20000
Caneyville-Garmon association, steepCgD4716551412lhshky05319901:20000
Garmon-Carpenter-Newbern complex, rocky, 30 to 65 percent slopesGcF80975551450lhtqky05719911:20000
Newbern-Garmon complex, very rocky, 12 to 30 percent slopesNrE12925551467lhv8ky05719911:20000
Garmon channery silt loam, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyGaF19205552339ljrdky15519861:20000
Dandridge and Westmoreland shaly silt loams, 20 to 50 percent slopes (dandridge, garmon)DaF30703549750lg1wky16919651:15840
Dandridge and Westmoreland silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes (dandridge, garmon)DcC5307549754lg20ky16919651:15840
Dandridge and Westmoreland shaly silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes (dandridge, garmon)DaD2796549749lg1vky16919651:15840
Dandridge and Westmoreland shaly silty clay loams, 20 to 50 percent slopes, severely eroded (dandridge, garmon)DbF31237549752lg1yky16919651:15840
Dandridge and Westmoreland silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes (dandridge, garmon)DcB972549753lg1zky16919651:15840
Dandridge and Westmoreland shaly silty clay loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded (dandridge, garmon)DbD3733549751lg1xky16919651:15840
Garmon association, steepGRF43130549901lg6rky17119771:20000
Garmon shaly silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesGaD7700549903lg6tky17119771:20000
Garmon shaly silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesGaC3255549902lg6sky17119771:20000
Garmon-Trimble complex, 30 to 80 percent slopesGmF27205552412ljtrky19919691:12000
Garmon-Caneyville association, very steepGCF43029552490ljx8ky20719791:20000
Caneyville-Garmon association, steepCGE14150552480ljwyky20719791:20000
Garmon-Caneyville association, very steepGcF27651550074lgdbky23119851:20000
Caneyville-Garmon association, steepCgD6460550063lgczky23119851:20000
Garmon silt loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesGaF8568551543lhxqky60619791:20000
Garmon silt loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesGmF20766550991lhbxky60819831:20000
Garmon channery silt loam, 25 to 80 percent slopes, rockyGmF29794552958lkdcky61819931:12000
Garmon-Shelocta complex, 25 to 60 percent slopeGaF27499552561ljzkky62019791:20000
Garmon silt loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesGmE28225551040lhdhky62119751:20000
Garmon silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesGaE527124529852nbjkky64619661:15840
Garmon silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesGaD137124529842nbjjky64619661:15840
Garmon shaly silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedGmE386024529862nbjlky64619661:15840
Garmon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesGaB78824529822nbjgky64619661:15840
Garmon silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedGaC237124529832nbjhky64619661:15840
Garmon-Newbern complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, rockyGnF53526531124ktp1tn02720021:24000
Garmon-Newbern complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesGnD2951636828pcnvtn02720021:24000
Garmon-Newbern complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, rockyGnF10302843339x9khtn13320031:24000
Garmon-Newbern complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, rockyGnF2153424391832ybz9tn70119851:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GARMON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .