Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GARLIC soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GARLIC, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GARLIC were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
93B02N0707S2001MI131005Garlic6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.9492989,-88.9620056

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GARLIC soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GARLIC series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GARLIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GARLIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GARLIC share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GARLIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GARLIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GARLIC, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-10-07 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Garlic-Waiska-Alcona association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

  2. MI-2010-09-10-08 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lupton-Tawas-Deford association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

  3. MI-2010-09-10-13 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Munising-Yalmer-Garlic association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing GARLIC as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Garlic sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes246B1414214553871kvfzmi00320071:24000
Garlic sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes246D1012714553881kvg0mi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, dissected76E550014552991kvc4mi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes, dissected76C238714552981kvc3mi00320071:24000
Garlic sand, 15 to 35 percent slopes246E222414553891kvg1mi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes77D102714553021kvc7mi00320071:24000
Frohling, calcareous substratum-Garlic-Cookson complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, dissected269E88014554111kvgrmi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes, dissected76F74414553001kvc5mi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes77B66014553011kvc6mi00320071:24000
Garlic-Blue Lake-Voelker complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes77E19114553031kvc8mi00320071:24000
Garlic sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes246B270631382p605mi09520041:24000
Garlic sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes246D86631383p606mi09520041:24000
Garlic-Alcona-Voelker complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes, dissected76F12142395271f89pmi10319991:24000
Garlic-Alcona-Voelker complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, dissected76E8951395270f89nmi10319991:24000
Garlic-Alcona-Voelker complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes, dissected76C6478395268f89lmi10319991:24000
Garlic-Fence complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes209B4840395314f8c2mi10319991:24000
Garlic-Alcona-Voelker complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes77D4556395272f89qmi10319991:24000
Garlic-Alcona-Voelker complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes77E386395273f89rmi10319991:24000
Garlic sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes21B1356214569581kx2nmi15320071:24000
Garlic sand, 15 to 35 percent slopes21E447814569591kx2pmi15320071:24000
Garlic sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes21D366814569611kx2rmi15320071:24000
Garlic-Alcona complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes130C2965435361gm0xmi60520041:24000
Garlic-Alcona complex, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes130E2792435362gm0ymi60520041:24000
Waiska-Garlic complex, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes, very bouldery102E1506800742vw7dmi60520041:24000
Garlic fine sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes120B1244800753vw7rmi60520041:24000
Garlic fine sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes120D876800752vw7qmi60520041:24000
Keweenaw-Garlic complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes133C853800771vw8bmi60520041:24000
Keweenaw-Garlic complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes133E697800768vw87mi60520041:24000
Waiska-Garlic complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes, very bouldery102C619800744vw7gmi60520041:24000
Waiska-Garlic complex, dissected, 15 to 60 percent slopes, very bouldery102F569800743vw7fmi60520041:24000
Keweenaw-Garlic complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes133F495800770vw89mi60520041:24000
Garlic fine sand, 15 to 35 percent slopes120E430800751vw7pmi60520041:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GARLIC soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .