Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GAILA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GAILA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GAILA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14882P0475S1982MD031002Gaila7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2376472,-77.1471944
14886P0897S1986MD031005Gaila7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1750583,-77.0482694
14805N0250S2004PA029005Gaila7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.8235016,-75.9508057

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GAILA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GAILA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GAILA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GAILA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GAILA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GAILA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GAILA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GAILA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MD-2010-09-10-02 | Cecil County -

    Glenelg-Brinklow-Manor-Glenville association (Soil Survey of Cecil County, Maryland).

  2. MD-2010-09-10-08 | Howard County - 2008

    Relationship of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Glenelg-Manor-Glenville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Howard County, Maryland; 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing GAILA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gaila loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD245124798952p7jmde00320091:24000
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC81124798942p7jlde00320091:24000
Gaila loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesGaE29024798962p7jnde00320091:24000
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC559624036682lp6pmd00520101:12000
Gaila loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaB309224036672lp6nmd00520101:12000
Gaila loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD8224036692lp6qmd00520101:12000
Gaila channery loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGbC167024957882ptjtmd01320101:12000
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC119524957902ptjwmd01320101:12000
Gaila channery loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGbD96724957872ptjsmd01320101:12000
Gaila channery loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGbB94624957862ptjrmd01320101:12000
Gaila loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaB78524957892ptjvmd01320101:12000
Gaila loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD15924958212ptjxmd01320101:12000
Gaila loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD66524407712mxtkmd01520091:12000
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC27924407702mxtjmd01520091:12000
Gaila loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesGaE21824407722mxtlmd01520091:12000
Gaila loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaB5424407692mxthmd01520091:12000
Gaila silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC13559037lrqgmd02120011:12000
Gaila silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaB2559036lrqfmd02120011:12000
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC1244792896vm29md02720041:12000
Gaila loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD184792897vm2bmd02720041:12000
Gaila silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes1C17060533592kx7nmd03119891:15840
Gaila silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes1B9469533591kx7mmd03119891:15840
Gaila-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes7UC637533679kxbgmd03119891:15840
Gaila-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes7UB608533678kxbfmd03119891:15840
Gaila loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC2324748562p292md03320091:12000
Gaila loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesGaB224748552p291md03320091:12000
Gaila silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD145915913901qdz5pa02920081:24000
Gaila silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGaC336598448130cf8pa04519601:20000
Gaila silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGaD106698448430cf2pa04519601:20000
Gaila sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes23E2764521164kh9rva15319851:15840
Gaila sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes23D2260521163kh9qva15319851:15840
Gaila sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes23C1921521162kh9pva15319851:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GAILA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .