Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GAIB soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GAIB, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GAIB were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GAIB soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GAIB series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GAIB series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GAIB series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GAIB share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GAIB series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GAIB series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GAIB, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GAIB as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gaib-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes2215674817752r2xid67319771:24000
Gaib-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes2112318817742r2wid67319771:24000
Elkcreek-Gaib complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes145301817662r2mid67319771:24000
Gaib-Winu complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes234794817762r2yid67319771:24000
Winu-Gaib complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes603675818172r48id67319771:24000
Gaib-Elkcreek complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes193047817712r2sid67319771:24000
Harahill-Gaib complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes253012817782r30id67319771:24000
Gaib-Elkcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes202771817732r2vid67319771:24000
Mulshoe-Hawksy-Gaib association, 2 to 30 percent slopes10954615485907j9mfid67519921:24000
Gaib-Wareagle-Rock outcrop association, 2 to 50 percent slopes624968486236j9z1id67519921:24000
Mulshoe, very stony surface-Gaib, very stony surface-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes848767793742nlgid68019851:24000
Mulshoe-Gaib-Winu complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes856500793752nlhid68019851:24000
Gaib-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes414851793272njyid68019851:24000
Winu-Gaib association, 30 to 60 percent slopes1114158792932nhvid68019851:24000
Elkcreek-Gaib complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes353151793202njqid68019851:24000
Gaib-Elkcreek-Simonton association, 20 to 60 percent slopes632050425195882r15id68520121:24000
Gaib-Rubble land complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes611956525195862r13id68520121:24000
Gaib-Elkcreek-Rock outcrop association, 2 to 20 percent slopes621917925195872r14id68520121:24000
Elkcreek-Gaib-Simonton complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes581089325195822r0zid68520121:24000
Gaib-Simonton-Rock outcrop association, 2 to 12 percent slopes64284825195892r16id68520121:24000
Mulshoe, very stony surface-Gaib, very stony surface-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes84-BL24031735992nlgid7031:24000
Gaib-Larabee complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes4015BO1419312016521zp6or60720181:24000
Lamulita-Top-Gaib complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes4017AO1583120174rctror60720181:24000
Gaib-Larabee-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent north slopes4016DO128312016621zp8or60720181:24000
Lamulita-Top-Gaib complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4017BO923120167rctqor60720181:24000
Melhorn-Larabee-Gaib complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4018BO2312016821zpbor60720181:24000
Melhorn-Larabee-Gaib complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4018BO587338531821zpbor62620181:24000
Lamulita-Top-Gaib complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4017BO5103122530rctqor62620181:24000
Klicker-Limberjim-Gaib complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4315NO32033853972dv4dor62620181:24000
Gaib-Larabee complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes4015BO301312252921zp6or62620181:24000
Gaib-Larabee-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent north slopes4016DO255338531621zp8or62620181:24000
Meaufun-Alding-Gaib complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes4076AO84338527812ff3or62620181:24000
Gaib-Klicker complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes4312NO7033853941nv9sor62620181:24000
Lamulita-Top-Gaib complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes4017AO643385317rctror62620181:24000
Meaufun-Gaib-Dupratt complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4077CO1633853402dv49or62620181:24000
Gaib gravelly loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes12612643490490jgd8or62819971:24000
Gaib-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes1286242490492jgdbor62819971:24000
Gaib-Ateron complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes1272530490491jgd9or62819971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GAIB soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .