Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FREMONT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FREMONT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FREMONT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/a40A4212S1975NY029010FREMONT6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FREMONT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FREMONT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREMONT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREMONT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FREMONT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREMONT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREMONT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FREMONT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2012-02-15-07 | Chautauqua County - August 1994

    Soils and parent material on a bedrock escarpment and on a lake plain that includes the Beach Ridge (Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York; August 1994).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-21 | Genesee County - March 1969

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Fremont-Hornell-Manlius association (Soil Survey of Genesee County, New York; March 1969).

  3. NY-2012-02-16-03 | Wyoming County - April 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in association 7 (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York; April 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing FREMONT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes80C36542999942vzrhny00320131:24000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes80B22822999932vzrcny00320131:24000
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes80A6882999922vzr6ny00320131:24000
Fremont silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes80D3632999952vzrnny00320131:24000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes80B65232897162vzrcny00920021:24000
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes80C26652897172vzrhny00920021:24000
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes80A23162897152vzr6ny00920021:24000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFmB604292898292vzrcny01319881:15840
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesFmC143632898302vzrhny01319881:15840
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFmA131012898282vzr6ny01319881:15840
Fremont silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesFmD7422898312vzrnny01319881:15840
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFrB18933017052vzrcny03720041:24000
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFrA10023017042vzr6ny03720041:24000
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesFrC3593017062vzrhny03720041:24000
Hornell and Fremont soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedHsD32403017192vzrqny03720041:24000
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes86C28831057152vzrhny05120191:24000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes86B7831057142vzrcny05120191:24000
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesFrC44012946122vzrhny09719761:15840
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFrB33362946112vzrcny09719761:15840
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFrA4992946102vzr6ny09719761:15840
Fremont silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesFrB175462948042vzrbny10119721:15840
Hornell and Fremont silt loams, 20 to 50 percent slopesHHE145432948092vzrrny10119721:15840
Hornell-Fremont silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopesHfC141402948072vzrfny10119721:15840
Hornell and Fremont silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopesHgD117222948082vzrmny10119721:15840
Hornell-Fremont silt loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHfB61632948062vzr8ny10119721:15840
Hornell and Fremont silty clay loams, 6 to 20 percent slopes, severely erodedHkD38102948102vzrgny10119721:15840
Fremont and Volusia channery silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesFVg105742958172srglny10719471:31680
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFrB80002953522vzrcny12119691:20000
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFrA44512953512vzr6ny12119691:20000
Fremont channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesFsC20352953532vzrlny12119691:20000
Fremont and Hornell soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesFtD10162953542vzrpny12119691:20000
Fremont and Hornell soils, 25 to 40 percent slopesFtE3322953552vzrsny12119691:20000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes80B133132648742vzrcny12319481:12000
Fremont silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes80A23832648732vzr6ny12319481:12000
Fremont silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes80C6332648752vzrhny12319481:12000
Fremont silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFxB402892722vzrcny60519811:24000
Volusia-Fremont silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopesVmB727926330792srg8pa04920121:12000
Urban land-Fremont complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesUmB182926330882vzr5pa04920121:12000
Volusia-Fremont silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesVmA155726330782srg7pa04920121:12000
Volusia-Fremont silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesVmC94626330802srg9pa04920121:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FREMONT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .