Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FREEST soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FREEST, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FREEST were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
135AS92AL-091-192AL091001-pgmFreest3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.3333333,-87.6166667
135A12N8055S2012AL101911Freest6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.2792972,-86.2463083

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FREEST soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FREEST series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREEST series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREEST series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FREEST share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREEST series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREEST series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FREEST, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AL-2010-02-25-01 | Wilcox County - March 1999

    Generalized patterns of soils, geomorphology, and landscape relationships in the Sucarnoochee-Congaree, Searcy-Freest, Demopolis-Watsonia, and Oktibbeha-Brantley general soil map units along Pine Barren Creek in the eastern part of Wilcox County (Soil Survey of Wilcox County, Alabama; 1999).

Map Units

Map units containing FREEST as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesFrC156932720432zkvyal00119721:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA37403286102sht2al02319981:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA923625149352v5lfal08520111:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesFsB2900330575c2zqal09119971:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFeA54626420802rjrmal12920131:24000
Lorman-Freest-Susquehanna complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesLqD27926420992x597al12920131:24000
Lorman-Freest-Susquehanna complex, 15 to 35 percent slopesLqF7826421002rjs8al12920131:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFrB3610331651c43fal13119971:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA27403316502v5lfal13119971:24000
Lorman-Freest-Susquehanna complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesLqD3371626422042x597ms04120121:24000
Susquehanna-Freest complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesSvC561326422482rs3sms04120121:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFeB112426421832rrydms04120121:24000
Lorman-Freest-Susquehanna complex, 15 to 35 percent slopesLqF41326422052rrz3ms04120121:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFeA13826421822rrycms04120121:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesFeC13526421842rryfms04120121:24000
Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes669599332597c52yms05919971:24000
Susquehanna-Freest complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes787107332600c531ms05919971:24000
Susquehanna-Freest complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes797075332601c532ms05919971:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFrB105743326222sht3ms06119741:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesFrC39063326232sht4ms06119741:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA32673326212sht2ms06119741:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes81C110753327402sht4ms06719841:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, undulating8427698332744c57pms06719841:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes81B25423327392sht3ms06719841:20000
Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedFrB22312332756c582ms06919911:20000
Freest sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA1529332755c581ms06919911:20000
Freestone-McLaurin-Susquehanna association, rolling (freest-mclaurin-susquehanna)FMC43159332851c5c4ms07319691:20000
Freestone, Susquehanna, and Prentiss soils, 5 to 12 percent slopes (freest, susquehanna and prentiss)FsD34438332853c5c6ms07319691:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFrA46033334132sht2ms10319831:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFrB14673334142sht3ms10319831:20000
Lorman-Freest-Susquehanna complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesLsD386293336092x597ms11119971:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFeC12338333603c64dms11119971:20000
Susquehanna and Freest soils, 2 to 5 percent slopesST8219333620c64yms11119971:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFrB1003624313662sht3ms12320091:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesFrC445524313672sht4ms12320091:24000
Freest loam, 5-8 percent slopes, erodedFrC23440333960c6hxms12719931:20000
Freest loam, 2-5 percent slopes, erodedFrB23422333959c6hwms12719931:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesFrC30513340452sht4ms12919971:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFrB25343340442sht3ms12919971:20000
Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesFsB893724034812sht3ms15320081:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesFsC351524034822sht4ms15320081:24000
Freest fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFsA102624034802sht2ms15320081:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FREEST soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .