Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FREDON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FREDON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FREDON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
10117N0434S2016NY037001Fredon6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.86937,-78.00832

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FREDON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FREDON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREDON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREDON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FREDON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREDON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREDON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FREDON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MA-2012-02-01-08 | Berkshire County - February 1988

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Copake-Hero-Hoosic general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Berkshire County, Massachusetts; February 1988).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-04 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Honeoye-Lima association (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-06 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Langford-Erie association and Langford-Howard association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-22 | Genesee County - March 1969

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Palmyra association (Soil Survey of Genesee County, New York; March 1969).

  5. NY-2012-02-15-37 | Niagara County - October 1972

    Typical cross section of the Otisville-Altmar-Fredon-Stafford association (Soil Survey of Niagara County, New York; October 1972).

  6. NY-2012-02-15-40 | Rockland County - October 1990

    Relationship between soils, landscape position, and parent materials in Rockland County (Soil Survey of Rockland County, New York; October 1990).

  7. NY-2012-02-15-48 | Tompkins County - July 1965

    Typical cross section of southern Tompkins County soils, consisting mainly of low-lime and very low-lime soils with a fragipan (Soil Survey of Tompkins County, New York; July 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing FREDON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Fredon silt loam1484233956479ljzct60120031:12000
Fredon silt loam, cold414433395898qwy1ct60120031:12000
Fredon fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes34A555227658398t1ma00319841:25000
Fredon and Halsey silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesFhA2772301828b42dme60719601:20000
Fredon and Halsey silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopesFhB1629301829b42fme60719601:20000
Fredon-Halsey complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, very stonyFrdAb10534319784bqrmnj03720021:24000
Fredon-Halsey complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, very stonyFrdAb6886114748217j1knj04120071:12000
Fredon loamFr5692894039q4lny01119681:15840
Fredon silt loamFr18392903339r3lny02119851:15840
Fredon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes34A56727230612rwbfny02320141:12000
Fredon silt loamFr42102906559rfzny02719921:24000
Fredon loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes197A4042914859s9rny03520071:24000
Fredon gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFpA1580633061p7rbny03720041:24000
Fredon fine sandy loamFr214725183149swgny04320181:24000
Fredon fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes28A156631056632y9vtny05120191:24000
Fredon silt loamFr24522925569tf9ny05319751:15840
Fredon silt loamFr14932928169tppny05719731:24000
Fredon gravelly silt loam3055242933979v9fny06519931:24000
Fredon loamFr17032935619vgqny06719731:20000
Fredon loamFd27112939239vvdny07119761:15840
Fredon loamFr6992940309vyvny07319731:15840
Fredon gravelly fine sandy loamFr29382941139w1jny07519731:15840
Fredon silt loamFr3382930749tz0ny07919871:12000
Fredon silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesFrA17322931629v1vny08319801:15840
Fredon loamFr1842932409v4cny08719861:24000
Fredon silt loamFr873309573bd47ny09319731:15840
Fredon and Halsey gravelly loamsFh2882944799wfbny09519651:15840
Fredon silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesFdB5412956059xlnny10919631:20000
Fredon silt loamFr20612959639xz6ny11519721:20000
Fredon loamFr43592957289xqmny11719721:15840
Fredon silt loamFr514309708bd8lny11919871:12000
Fredon gravelly loamFr31252929969twhny66419681:15840
Fredon loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFeB715538174l20gpa01919841:15840
Fredon loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFeA557538173l20fpa01919841:15840
Fredon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes320A6126331472rg7hpa03919731:20000
Fredon silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFrA927826330712rg7hpa04920121:12000
Fredon fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes72A13102815779g04vt00319921:20000
Fredon gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes72A10772824449gx3vt02119851:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FREDON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .