Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FOXGULCH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FOXGULCH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FOXGULCH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FOXGULCH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FOXGULCH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FOXGULCH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FOXGULCH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FOXGULCH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FOXGULCH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FOXGULCH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FOXGULCH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing FOXGULCH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Foxgulch, rarely flooded-Mooseflat, occasionally flooded-Copperbasin, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes13B2631859516w8psmt60520071:24000
Mooseflat, rarely flooded-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes414A70185957520f19mt60520071:24000
Foxgulch, rarely flooded-Kilgore, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, very stony936B30185973720f6jmt60520071:24000
Bearmouth, rarely flooded-Foxgulch, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, very stony68B3185968320f4smt60520071:24000
Foxgulch, rarely flooded-Mooseflat, occasionally flooded-Copperbasin, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes13B16308812720w8psmt61020051:24000
Foxgulch-Copperbasin-Wisdom complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes15A9545812391w8c5mt61020051:24000
Foxgulch-Bearmouth-Copperbasin complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes113B130915078451mm15mt61020051:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes414A141616975091tzdcmt61620031:24000
Bearmouth-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded505B64517145231vk36mt62420211:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D329796342qbyymt62420211:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D576425128722qbyymt6321:24000
Apikuni-Foxgulch family, occasionally flooded-Jonescreek family, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes2121C7253384047316lvmt6331:24000
Parkcity family-Foxgulch family, occasionally flooded-Jonescreek family, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes2132C6243384049316lwmt6331:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes165A4317031301v57pmt63520061:24000
Kilgore-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes612A1517031971v59vmt63520061:24000
Foxgulch-Libeg complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, stony51Ds717031231v57gmt63520061:24000
Kilgore-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes2514616975051tzd7mt63619831:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D9929796732qbyymt63720141:24000
Bearmouth-Foxgulch complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded505B19533124571vk36mt63920001:24000
Mooseflat, rarely flooded-Foxgulch, very rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes165A218714246801jthfmt67020071:24000
Foxgulch-Bearmouth, very stony complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes67A94514246421jtg6mt67020071:24000
Bearmouth, rarely flooded-Foxgulch, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, very stony68B60714246411jtg5mt67020071:24000
Kilgore, frequently flooded-Foxgulch, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes612A59214247471jtklmt67020071:24000
Foxgulch loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes69B59114246401jtg4mt67020071:24000
Foxgulch, rarely flooded-Kilgore, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, very stony936B32514248371jtnhmt67020071:24000
Foxgulch-Libeg complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, stony51D30214246311jtfvmt67020071:24000
Foxgulch, occasionally flooded-Bearmouth, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, stony933B17214248401jtnlmt67020071:24000
Brownsgulch-Foxgulch complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes614B13914247461jtkkmt67020071:24000
Foxcreek-Foxgulch-Wyotah families association, 0 to 15 percent slopesNS104830924960642pv2rut6471:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FOXGULCH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .