Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FLAGG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FLAGG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FLAGG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FLAGG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FLAGG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FLAGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FLAGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FLAGG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FLAGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FLAGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FLAGG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing FLAGG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B79561998426pyjil00720061:12000
Flagg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes419A19761998416pyhil00720061:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C274714072001j79kil00720061:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C21175850410xjxlil01520051:12000
Flagg silty clay loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded419D3498850480xjzvil01520051:12000
Flagg silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded419D2307849833xj9zil01520051:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B120850408xjxjil01520051:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C2671194956923fpbil08519901:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B504194966123fs9il08519901:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B4605208626702wil14120051:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C22723208627702xil14120051:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C2351815920451qfn9il17720061:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B167215920441qfn8il17720061:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes419B330114740241lgv5il20119971:12000
Flagg silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded419C2200714740251lgv6il20119971:12000
Flagg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes419A2721740925v4wil20119971:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedFlB21978425261g8j3wi04519691:12000
Flagg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedFlC2914425262g8j4wi04519691:12000
Flagg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFlA151425260g8j2wi04519691:12000
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesFlB4167426306g9ltwi10519701:20000
Flagg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFlA600426305g9lswi10519701:20000
Flagg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesFgA2753425614g8whwi12719671:15840
Flagg silt loam, mottled subsoil variant, 0 to 3 percent slopesFlA2344425616g8wkwi12719671:15840
Flagg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesFgB222425615g8wjwi12719671:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FLAGG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .