Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FENCE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FENCE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FENCE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
90A40A163472WI041006Fence6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.4461098,-88.7649994
90A88P019087WI037004Fence6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.956665,-88.5619431
9200P1221S1998WI031001Fence6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.5755501,-91.6051636
9204N0459S2003MI131006Fence7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7868729,-88.9950943
93B90P106290MI061007Fence7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6752777,-88.7063904
94D79P039079WI125001Fence6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.9197235,-89.1699982
94D79P039579WI125002Fence7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.2513885,-89.8494415
n/a89P033989MI061001Fence5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FENCE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FENCE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FENCE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FENCE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FENCE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FENCE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FENCE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FENCE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-10-04 | Gogebic County - 2010

    A typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Gogebic-Wakefield-Cathro association (Soil Survey of Gogebic County, Michigan; 2010).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-29 | Iron County - October 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wabeno association (Soil Survey of Iron County, Michigan; October 1997).

  3. WI-2012-03-23-28 | Oconto County - September 1988

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Tilleda-Menominee association (Soil Survey of Oconto County, WI; 1988).

Map Units

Map units containing FENCE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes, dissected104C16914553081kvcfmi00320071:24000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes8150B175224506742n840mi01319841:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 18 percent slopes, dissected8135C82724506692n83vmi01319841:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 6 to 18 percent slopes8150C71724506752n841mi01319841:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes14B1467415197fy1gmi04319851:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 6 to 18 percent slopes14D291415198fy1hmi04319851:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes625B276914562111kw9kmi05320071:24000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 6 to 18 percent slopes625C219214562121kw9lmi05320071:24000
Manido-Fence-Gogebic, sandy substratum, complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes296B94214561741kw8cmi05320071:24000
Fence silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes16A614560181kw3bmi05320071:24000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes8150B107624847402pdkxmi06119891:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 6 to 18 percent slopes8150C49524847412pdkymi06119891:20000
Nunica-Fence complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes60B181416141fz0xmi06119891:20000
Fence silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes79A739416023fyx3mi07119921:20000
Fence silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes79B233416024fyx4mi07119921:20000
Fence silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes286B1184631339p5ysmi09520041:24000
Garlic-Fence complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes209B4840395314f8c2mi10319991:24000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes, dissected104C1757394952f7zdmi10319991:24000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes117B693394995f80smi10319991:24000
Fence silt loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes134B296414565621kwnwmi13120071:24000
Fence silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes134D44514565631kwnxmi13120071:24000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 6 to 15 percent slopes242C51214443901kh07wi00320061:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 0 to 6 percent slopes242B23114443891kh06wi00320061:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 0 to 6 percent slopes242B717433386gjz6wi00720051:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 6 to 15 percent slopes242C408433387gjz7wi00720051:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 0 to 6 percent slopes242B30113859591hj6cwi03120051:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 6 to 15 percent slopes242C5613859601hj6dwi03120051:12000
Fence silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesFeB1794430004gfg3wi03719951:12000
Fence silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesFeB2498429836gf8pwi04119951:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 6 to 12 percent slopes242C205782026v7rnwi05120061:12000
Fence silt loam, lake terrace, 0 to 6 percent slopes242B34782025v7rmwi05120061:12000
Fence silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesFsB564422395g5jnwi07519871:20000
Fence silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesFsC177422396g5jpwi07519871:20000
Fence very fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesFsB4148422465g5lxwi08319851:15840
Fence very fine sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesFsC847422466g5lywi08319851:15840
Gogebic-Fence-Pence complex, 3 to 15 percent slopesGoC22098421239g4bcwi12519851:20000
Gogebic-Fence-Pence complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesGoB7666421238g4bbwi12519851:20000
Fence-Alcona complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesFeB2053421234g4b6wi12519851:20000
Fence-Alcona complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesFeC437421235g4b7wi12519851:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FENCE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .