Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FEDSCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FEDSCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FEDSCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12583KY-195-01883KY-195-018Fedscreekn/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.4778442,-82.407074
n/a67KY-205-00267KY-205-002Fedscreek4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a89KY-115-00289KY-115-002Fedscreek3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FEDSCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FEDSCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FEDSCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FEDSCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FEDSCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FEDSCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FEDSCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FEDSCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-12 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Handshoe-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-15 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Dekalb general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  3. KY-2010-09-03-16 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  4. KY-2010-09-03-17 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny and Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map units. The Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny general soil map unit is along the Tug and Lavista Forks of the Big Sandy River and their major tributaries, and the Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map unit is on the mountains (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  5. KY-2010-09-03-18 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock and Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map units. The Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock general soil map unit is on the mountains and in the surface mined areas, and the Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map unit is in the valleys (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  6. KY-2010-09-03-41 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Shelocta-Fedscreek-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  7. KY-2010-09-27-01 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  8. KY-2012-01-30-01 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Fedscreek-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  9. KY-2012-01-30-02 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Sharondale-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  10. KY-2012-01-30-03 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  11. KY-2012-02-01-37 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along the Levisa and Russell Forks of the Big Sandy River, the soils in the valleys are in the Nelse-Shelbiana-Udorthents general soil map unit and those on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  12. KY-2012-02-01-38 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along the major tributaries in Pike County, the soils on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb general soil map unit and those in the valleys are in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  13. KY-2012-02-01-39 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along Elkhorn Creek and Pine Mountain, the upper faulted mountains are in the Kimper-Sharondale-Berks-Shelocta general soil map unit, the lower mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit, and the valley is in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing FEDSCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Handshoe-Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyuHfsF2277730987172x5j1ky02519911:24000
Shelocta-Handshoe-Fedscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, stonyuShfF5105830987062xnk5ky06320071:12000
Handshoe-Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyuHfsF6539430256972x5j1ky19519861:24000
Fedscreek-Marrowbone-Dekalb complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyFmF46249550031lgbyky19519861:24000
Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Myra complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyMmF18755550040lgc7ky19519861:24000
Fedscreek-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesFgE4656550030lgbxky19519861:24000
Handshoe-Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyuHfsF5864730987142x5j1ky62619971:24000
Handshoe-Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyuHfsF9260630257012x5j1ky63919911:24000
Shelocta-Handshoe-Fedscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, stonyuShfF4108430987072xnk5ky63919911:24000
Hazleton-Fedscreek-Kimper complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyHkF39279550868lh6yky63919911:24000
Gilpin-Fedscreek-Marrowbone complex, 20 to 60 percent slopesGfF18699550866lh6wky63919911:24000
Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesFsF2258550865lh6vky63919911:24000
Shelocta-Handshoe-Fedscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, stonyuShfF7641730987082xnk5ky64019961:24000
Handshoe-Fedscreek-Shelocta complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyuHfsF4116330257022x5j1ky64019961:24000
Shelocta-Handshoe-Fedscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, stonyuShfF14258230987092xnk5ky64119941:24000
Kimper-Fedscreek complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, stonyKfF21570550941lh99ky64119941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FEDSCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .