Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FARRELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FARRELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FARRELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
888P021287WA021006Farrell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6313896,-118.3672256
890P096090WA021007Farrell7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6319427,-118.3672256

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FARRELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FARRELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FARRELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FARRELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FARRELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FARRELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FARRELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FARRELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-13 | Whitman County - April 1980

    Typical landscape in the Kuhl-Alpowa association (Soil Survey of Whitman County, Washington; April 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing FARRELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesFAB85906817528y6wa00119651:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, erodedFFD278126817728y8wa00119651:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopesFAD56176817628y7wa00119651:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 30 to 40 percent slopes, erodedFFE23906817828y9wa00119651:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes178480699428rgt6wa01719981:12000
Farrell loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes183746716222djdwa02119941:20000
Farrell loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes193141716412dk0wa02119941:20000
Magallon-Winchester-Farrell complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes542487717972dq1wa02119941:20000
Magallon-Stratford-Farrell complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes532476717912dpvwa02119941:20000
Farrell loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes211757716742dl2wa02119941:20000
Farrell loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes20974716602dkmwa02119941:20000
Farrell loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes22703716862dlgwa02119941:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes48121886882229m2wa02519791:24000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes4947596882329m3wa02519791:24000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes4076286863729f3wa04319781:24000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes3940736863529f1wa04319781:24000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 0 to 7 percent slopes3691168531299pwa07519751:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 7 to 25 percent slopes3758768532299qwa07519751:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesFeD3993696662bh9wa61319671:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 30 to 45 percent slopesFeE2593696672bhbwa61319671:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesFeC1501696652bh8wa61319671:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, erodedFaD21017696622bh5wa61319671:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 30 to 45 percent slopesFaE841696632bh6wa61319671:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, erodedFaC2262696612bh4wa61319671:20000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesFeB218696642bh7wa61319671:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesFaA60696602bh3wa61319671:20000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes1603076702792c42wa64819871:24000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes1611379702802c43wa64819871:24000
Farrell fine sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes162962702812c44wa64819871:24000
Farrell very bouldery fine sandy loam, 0 to 20 percent slopes163243702822c45wa64819871:24000
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopesFaC1172713312d70wa67119611:31680
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesFaD928713322d71wa67119611:31680
Farrell very fine sandy loam, 30 to 60 percent slopesFaF211713332d72wa67119611:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FARRELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .