Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FAIM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FAIM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FAIM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
4713N57553S2012UT039002Faim7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1323194,-111.3568528
4713N57554S2012UT039003Faim7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3201722,-111.4882111
4713N57556S2012UT039005Faim7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2380278,-111.5198778
4713N57562S2012UT049001Faim7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1853722,-111.3597028

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FAIM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FAIM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FAIM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FAIM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FAIM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FAIM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FAIM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FAIM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing FAIM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Manila-Tahquats family-Faim complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes46224531732502rg02id71119831:24000
Broadhead-Faim-Farlow family, very stony surface, complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes46115531732492rg01id71119831:24000
Yago, very stony surface-Manila-Faim complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes5491331732562rg07id71119831:24000
Winnemucca-Faim-Dranburn complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes85-CNF231732362rfzwid71119831:24000
Beaverdam-Davtone-Faim families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes813911827444302stpxid7131:24000
Sessions-Faim-Rammel family, complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes804692726634332rq52id7131:24000
Slights family-Winnemucca, low effective precipitation-Faim complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes818644527444352stq2id7131:24000
Broadhead-Faim-Farlow family, very stony surface, complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes461604526198692rg01id7131:24000
Faim-Skutum family, very deep, complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes820593727334302slqtid7131:24000
Yago, very stony surface-Manila-Faim complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes549413926198752rg07id7131:24000
Bischoff-Tingey family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes931401329638582wv1gid7131:24000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 5 to 30 percent slopes951332029638552wv1yid7131:24000
Manila-Tahquats family-Faim complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes462283826198702rg02id7131:24000
Bischoff-Resoot family, very stony surface-Faim, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes855276027334672sls5id7131:24000
Sessions family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes802263926634322rq51id7131:24000
Ezbin-Faim complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes833253627334442slrdid7131:24000
Hourglass family, very stony surface-Faim-Davtone family, complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes810211327334362slr1id7131:24000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 30 to 55 percent slopes952177929841462x039id7131:24000
Winnemucca-Faim-Dranburn complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes85170526198642rfzwid7131:24000
Oxvalley family, extremely stony surface-Faim complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes85368827334632sls3id7131:24000
Wayan-Faim-Silex family, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes80867427334342slqzid7131:24000
Yago, very stony surface-Manila-Faim complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes5498731733482rg07id71419971:24000
Broadhead-Faim-Farlow family, very stony surface, complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes461331733442rg01id71419971:24000
Broadhead-Faim-Farlow family, very stony surface, complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes46181331733732rg01id71519941:24000
Manila-Tahquats family-Faim complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes46222631733742rg02id71519941:24000
Yago, very stony surface-Manila-Faim complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes5496531733792rg07id71519941:24000
Winnemucca-Faim-Dranburn complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes85-CNF3331733632rfzwid71519941:24000
Sessions-Faim-Rammel family, complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes80456431634302rq52id7161:24000
Bischoff-Resoot family, very stony surface-Faim, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes85543731634422sls5id7161:24000
Sessions family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes80242031634292rq51id7161:24000
Faim-Skutum family, very deep, complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes8208131634312slqtid7161:24000
Slights family-Winnemucca, low effective precipitation-Faim complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes8185131634532stq2id7161:24000
Beaverdam-Davtone-Faim families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes8133931634512stpxid7161:24000
Wayan-Faim-Silex family, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes80820228586392slqzid75819981:24000
Oxvalley family, extremely stony surface-Faim complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes8535428586522sls3id75819981:24000
Bischoff-Resoot family, very stony surface-Faim, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes8554528586552sls5id75819981:24000
Sessions family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes8024028586362rq51id75819981:24000
Hourglass family, very stony surface-Faim-Davtone family, complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes810728586412slr1id75819981:24000
Faim-Wesdy, extremely bouldery-Flygare, very stony complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes551750724989282pzwjut0131:24000
Faim-Yeates Hollow complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes, very stony554614924989292pzwkut0131:24000
Adel-Maciver, moist-Faim complex, 25 to 70 percent slopesANF245433729586472wrg6ut0131:24000
Floak, moist-Faim-Heath, moist complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesANF240351129586412wrg1ut0131:24000
Lyard-Faim, very stony-Dex, extremely stony complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes563105024989322pzwnut0131:24000
Parkay-Faim-Wallsburg complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes1763031483474j72yut6281:24000
Harol-Zillion, cold-Faim association, 4 to 40 percent slopes138898483567j75yut6281:24000
Harol, very stony-Zillion, rubbly-Faim association, 4 to 40 percent slopes138621328102682trdvut6291:24000
Faim clay loam, 4 to 40 percent slopes37820896483905j7jvut63419971:24000
Faim clay loam, 4 to 25 percent slopes37718246483904j7jtut63419971:24000
Castino-Faim families complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes45A331288130gwvut6451:24000
Faim-Hofly families complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes600H331485830hlqut6451:24000
Faim-Clayburn-Castino families complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes600331485730hlrut6451:24000
Faim-Castino families complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes602331485630hlput6451:24000
Croydon-Faim-Kitchell families, moist, 20 to 60 percent slopes715B331290430gxlut6451:24000
Clayburn-Behanin-Faim families complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes561B331288730gx1ut6451:24000
Faim-Clayburn families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes411331287230gwkut6451:24000
Faim-Geertsen families complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes411A331287330gwlut6451:24000
Faim-Clayburn-Geertsen families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes412331287430gwmut6451:24000
Clayburn-Faim families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes561331288530gwzut6451:24000
Faim-Castino families complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes41331287130gwjut6451:24000
Castino-Kitchell-Faim families complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes418116331286830gwfut6451:24000
Castino-Faim families complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes2669132432882zsd6ut6451:24000
Clayburn-Faim-Wesdy families complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes110A337032432732zscnut6451:24000
Wesdy-Faim-Arrowpeak families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes47829458512514k69qut6461:24000
Cheadle-Faim families association, 2 to 30 percent slopes2704640512482k68put6461:24000
Clayburn-Faim families association, 5 to 20 percent slopes126625215nzl7ut6491:24000
Faim-Tellura families, association, 2 to 30 percent slopes153625233nzltut6491:24000
Tellura-Faim-Behanin families, association, 5 to 45 percent slopes206581654mj81ut6491:24000
Castino-Faim families, complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes1616791791228vkbhut6511:24000
Beaverdam-Davtone-Faim families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes81394728586702stpxwy62319711:20000
Faim-Skutum family, very deep, complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes82046128586632slqtwy62319711:20000
Slights family-Winnemucca, low effective precipitation-Faim complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes81820928586722stq2wy62319711:20000
Sessions-Faim-Rammel family, complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes80414928586612rq52wy62319711:20000
Bischoff-Resoot family, very stony surface-Faim, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes85514028586672sls5wy62319711:20000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 5 to 30 percent slopes9518230834842wv1ywy62319711:20000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 30 to 55 percent slopes9521330834932x039wy62319711:20000
Sessions family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes802428586602rq51wy62319711:20000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 30 to 55 percent slopes9524330834572x039wy66320121:24000
Bischoff-Tingey family-Faim complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes9312330834562wv1gwy66320121:24000
Bischoff-Dranburn-Faim complex 5 to 30 percent slopes951330834542wv1ywy66320121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FAIM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .