Soil Data Explorer - FREETOWN

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FREETOWN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FREETOWN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FREETOWN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
144A	00P1231	2000CT015002	Freetown	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.843483,-72.0529709

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FREETOWN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FREETOWN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREETOWN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREETOWN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FREETOWN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREETOWN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREETOWN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FREETOWN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MA-2010-09-10-03 | Middlesex County - 2009

   A typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hinckley-Freetown-Windsor association (Soil Survey of Middlesex County, Massachusetts; 2009).

2. MA-2010-09-10-04 | Middlesex County - 2009

   A typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Urban land-Merriac-Udorthents association (Soil Survey of Middlesex County, Massachusetts; 2009).

3. MA-2012-02-01-03 | Barnstable County - March 1993

   Relationship of soils, landscapes, and parent material in the Enfield-Merrimac-Carver general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Barnstable County, Massachusetts; March 1993).

4. MA-2012-02-01-04 | Barnstable County - March 1993

   The relationship of soils, landscapes, and parent material in the Carver general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Barnstable County, Massachusetts; March 1993).

5. MA-2012-02-01-10 | Bristol County, Southern Part - October 1981

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Paxton-Woodbridge-Whitman association (Soil Survey of Bristol County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; October 1981).

6. MA-2012-02-01-11 | Bristol County, Southern Part - October 1981

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hinckley-Freetown-Scarboro association (Soil Survey of Bristol County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; October 1981).

7. MA-2012-02-01-12 | Dukes County - September 1986

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Carver general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Dukes County, Massachusetts; September 1986).

8. MA-2012-02-01-15 | Dukes County - September 1986

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Plymouth-Montauk complex, rolling, extremely bouldery (Soil Survey of Dukes County, Massachusetts; September 1986).

9. MA-2012-02-02-07 | Essex County, Southern Part - May 1984

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Merrimac-Hinckley-Urban land association (Soil Survey of Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; May 1984).

10. MA-2012-02-02-09 | Essex County, Southern Part - May 1984

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Canton-Woodbridge-Freetown association (Soil Survey of Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; May 1984).

11. MA-2012-02-02-11 | Hampden and Hampshire Counties, Eastern Part - April 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Canton-Gloucester-Scituate general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Hampden and Hampshire Counties, Massachusetts, Eastern Part; April 1989).

12. MA-2012-02-02-21 | Norfolk and Suffolk Counties - September 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Freetown-Swansea-Saco general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Norfolk and Suffolk Counties, Massachusetts; September 1989).

13. MA-2012-02-03-07 | Worcester County, Southern Part - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Merrimac-Hinckley-Windsor association (Soil Survey of Worcester County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; 1998).

14. MA-2012-02-03-08 | Worcester County, Southern Part - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Freetown-Swansea-Saco association (Soil Survey of Worcester County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; 1998).

Map Units

Map units containing FREETOWN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Catden and Freetown soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes	18	18874	3395651	2t2r2	ct601	2003	1:12000
Catden and Freetown soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes	18	20626	3396024	2t2r2	ct602	2003	1:12000
Freetown coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, sanded surface	55A	4029	276518	2t2qj	ma001	1984	1:25000
Freetown and Swansea mucks, coastal lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	54A	3748	276517	2tyqd	ma001	1984	1:25000
Freetown muck, ponded, coastal lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	1065	276516	2t2qg	ma001	1984	1:25000
Freetown and Swansea mucks, coastal lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	54A	1471	276682	2tyqd	ma007	1983	1:20000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	1764	278834	2t2q9	ma011	2012	1:12000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	182	2520127	2t2qc	ma011	2012	1:12000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	30435	796346	2t2q9	ma017	1991	1:24000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	5267	276913	2t2qc	ma017	1991	1:24000
Freetown and Swansea mucks, coastal lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	1319	276987	2tyqd	ma019	1977	1:20000
Freetown and Swansea coarse sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, sanded surface and inactive	55A	309	276988	2tx05	ma019	1977	1:20000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	14187	309349	2t2q9	ma023	2010	1:12000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	8377	309350	2t2qc	ma023	2010	1:12000
Freetown coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, sanded surface	55A	5411	309479	2t2qj	ma023	2010	1:12000
Freetown and Swansea coarse sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, sanded surface and inactive	704A	1280	309478	2tx05	ma023	2010	1:12000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	15176	277028	2t2q9	ma602	1976	1:20000
Freetown coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, sanded surface	55A	431	277027	2t2qj	ma602	1976	1:20000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	8	779112	2t2qc	ma602	1976	1:20000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	8458	779958	2t2q9	ma603	1979	1:20000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	952	779962	2t2qc	ma603	1979	1:20000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	9887	790427	2t2q9	ma605	1977	1:15840
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	7185	791067	2t2q9	ma606	1981	1:15840
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	1164	791069	2t2qc	ma606	1981	1:15840
Freetown muck, central lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	2234	277458	2t2qf	ma607	1975	1:15840
Freetown and Swansea mucks, 0 to 2 percent slopes	54A	753	277476	2t2r3	ma607	1975	1:15840
Freetown muck, central lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	1799	277723	2t2qf	ma609	1980	1:15840
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	3706	789758	2t2q9	ma610	1985	1:25000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	8184	807426	2t2q9	ma613	1982	1:20000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	678	807427	2t2qc	ma613	1982	1:20000
Freetown and Swansea mucky peats, 0 to 2 percent slopes	54A	435	3045269	2w68w	ma614	1993	1:25000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52A	12180	278127	2t2q9	ma615	1992	1:25000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53A	2416	278129	2t2qc	ma615	1992	1:25000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	52	9900	791706	2t2q9	ma616	1985	1:25000
Freetown muck, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes	53	2210	791707	2t2qc	ma616	1985	1:25000
Freetown mucky peat, 0 to 2 percent slopes	295	16328	279302	2w68v	nh015	1986	1:24000
Freetown and Natchaug mucky peats, ponded, 0 to 2 percent slopes	97	7977	279373	2w690	nh015	1986	1:24000
Freetown and Swansea mucky peats, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Mp	6722	279906	2w68w	nh017	1968	1:20000
Freetown mucky peat, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Gw	3628	280971	2w68v	nh601	1980	1:20000
Freetown mucky peat, 0 to 2 percent slopes	296A	2827	1895806	2w68v	nh609	2007	1:24000
Freetown muck, coastal lowland, 0 to 1 percent slopes	Fr	111	292910	2t2qd	ny059	1983	1:24000
Freetown mucky peat	Fr	304	543972	l81h	pa035	2002	1:24000
Muck	Mu	2632	296466	9yhf	pa079	1974	1:20000
Mucky peat, deep	Mp	3588	296341	9ycd	pa089	1975	1:20000
Freetown mucky peat	20	304	296396	9yf5	pa089	1975	1:20000
Freetown mucky peat	20	10838	297196	9z7z	pa103	1995	1:24000
Peat	Pt	1155	297075	9z42	pa115	1968	1:20000
Freetown mucky peat	20	55	319861	bqv3	pa127	1977	1:20000
Freetown muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes	FeA	15030	2519931	2t2q9	ri600	1977	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FREETOWN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).