Soil Data Explorer - FALCON

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FALCON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FALCON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FALCON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FALCON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FALCON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the FALCON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the FALCON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FALCON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the FALCON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the FALCON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FALCON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing FALCON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Kettle-Falcon complex, 9 to 65 percent slopes	KfF	5724	498730	jqz2	co622	1968	1:20000
Falcon-Trag families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes, extremely stony	FT	219	95468	36bm	co626	1974	1:24000
Falcon family-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 150 percent slopes	100	343	496564	jnq6	co627	1980	1:24000
Falcon-Trag families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	101	173	496565	jnq7	co627	1980	1:24000
Falcon family-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 150 percent slopes	504Y	2648	509835	k3j9	co636	2011	1:24000
Falcon-Trag families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	506M	2158	509839	k3jf	co636	2011	1:24000
Coberly-Falcon, dry complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes	124	1717	509472	k34l	co660	1994	1:24000
Falcon-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes	141	1321	509494	k359	co660	1994	1:24000
Falcon, dry-Coberly, cool complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes	140	706	509492	k357	co660	1994	1:24000
Falcon-Burnac-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	39	2731	502047	jvf2	co675	1986	1:24000
Burnac-Delson-Falcon sandy loams, 20 to 50 percent slopes	28	1526	502030	jvdj	co675	1986	1:24000
Belain-Falcon families complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes	11	12855	510575	k495	co676	1983	1:24000
Falcon-Dough families-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes	19	4577	510583	k49f	co676	1983	1:24000
Falcon-Rock outcrop complex	30	1539	503721	jx52	ut616	1983	1:24000
Modo-Falcon complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes	099	403	1887353	21byc	ut623	2011	1:24000
Reva-Falcon families-Rock outcrop complex	49	98901	504544	jy0m	ut624	1985	1:24000
Herm-Tomasaki-Falcon complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes	39	17338	55359	1vls	ut633	1983	1:24000
Falcon-Bond-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes	27	8065	55346	1vlc	ut633	1983	1:24000
Falcon fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	24	6126	55343	1vl8	ut633	1983	1:24000
Falcon-Bond-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	26	4563	55345	1vlb	ut633	1983	1:24000
Falcon gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes	25	1478	55344	1vl9	ut633	1983	1:24000
Falcon family gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes	57		3312891	30gx5	ut645		1:24000
Rottulee-Falcon-Sheckle families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	mt26	15294	3202676	2zbvb	ut645		1:24000
Falcon-Sheckle-Rottulee families-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	mt27	10211	3202677	2zbvc	ut645		1:24000
Derecho-Hogg-Falcon families complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	mt36	7971	3202679	2zbvf	ut645		1:24000
Falcon, dry-Breece families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	mt25	5440	3202675	2zbv9	ut645		1:24000
Breece-Falcon, dry families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	mt24	2871	3202674	2zbv8	ut645		1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FALCON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).