Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the EUFAULA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of EUFAULA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to EUFAULA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
86A40A4655S1975TX113001EUFAULA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.6146049,-96.6336136

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the EUFAULA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the EUFAULA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EUFAULA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EUFAULA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with EUFAULA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EUFAULA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EUFAULA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with EUFAULA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2012-02-16-15 | Comanche County - August 1967

    Topography and underlying material of major soils in northeastern part of county (Soil Survey of Comanche County, Oklahoma; August 1967).

  2. OK-2012-02-16-50 | Hughes County - December 1968

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 4 and 5 (Soil Survey of Hughes County, Oklahoma; December 1968).

  3. OK-2012-02-17-06 | Love County - September 1966

    A diagram showing typical relief in the southern part of Love County and the relative position of the soils in associations 1, 3, and 6 (Soil Survey of Love County, Oklahoma; September 1966).

  4. OK-2012-02-17-17 | Okmulgee County - May 1968

    Relationship of the Taloka and Choteau soils (upper right) to the soils of the Dennis-Bates-Parsons, Collinsville-Talihina, Hector-Hartsells, Konawa-Stidham, and Verdigris-Lightning-Pulaski associations. (The Deep Fork River is also known as the Deep Fork Canadian River) (Soil Survey of Okmulgee County, Oklahoma; May 1968).

  5. OK-2012-02-17-23 | Pawnee County - March 1959

    Prairie and forest soils formed in recent alluvium, and in adjoining areas of silty and sandy mantle material (Soil Survey of Pawnee County, Oklahoma; March 1959).

  6. OK-2012-02-17-24 | Pawnee County - March 1959

    Woodland soils of the eastern part of the county formed in sandstone and shale, and in soft, sandy mantle material (Soil Survey of Pawnee County, Oklahoma; March 1959).

  7. OK-2012-02-17-31 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Konawa-Dougherty-Derby map unit (Soil Survey of Payne Oklahoma; April 1987).

  8. OK-2012-02-17-32 | Pittsburg County - May 1971

    Major soils and underlying material in soil associations 1, 2, 3, and 7 (Soil Survey of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma; May 1971).

  9. OK-2012-02-17-62 | Woodward County - November 1963

    Typical pattern of soils of the Nobscot-Brownfield association (Soil Survey of Woodward County, Oklahoma; November 1963).

  10. TX-2012-03-21-56 | Palo Pinto County - August 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Bastrop-Apalo map unit (Soil Survey of Palo Pinto County, TX; 1981).

Map Units

Map units containing EUFAULA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB17343109240dtcvok01119651:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 3 to 15 percent slopes29483381809dt9fok01319741:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesDuD310833818822tq7wok01519671:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopesEfD98653818832tq87ok01519671:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB1096381884dtcvok01519671:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopesEuC931381885dtcwok01519671:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes141490381996dthgok01919771:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopesEuD14913821732tq87ok03119651:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesDoED23213800552tq7wok03119651:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 percent slopesEb3918382285dtssok03719521:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesEa1939382284dtsrok03719521:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 8 to 20 percent slopesDoEF25125163641t7xbok03719521:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB28173109241dtcvok03919731:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB1633109242dtcvok04319611:24000
Stephenville-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes53198293826752xm2nok05119751:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes7116093826902tq7wok05119751:24000
Eufaula-Stephenville complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes92415382692dv6xok05119751:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes822713826912tq87ok05119751:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes16920383278dvttok06919761:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesDxC30693833272tq7wok07119651:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesDxB6873833262tq7xok07119651:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesDeC214233833902tq7wok07319601:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesDeB206143833892tq7xok07319601:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopesEu39413833922tq87ok07319601:24000
Eufaula-Dougherty complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesEdE5347383511dw2bok08119661:24000
Eufaula soils, 3 to 8 percent slopesEuC163913837152zbmjok08519631:24000
Eufaula soils, 0 to 3 percent slopesEuB105093837142zbmhok08519631:24000
Eufaula and Weatherford soils, 8 to 25 percent slopesSy2551383745dw9wok08519631:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes9969383911dwh7ok09519781:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes25184383930dwhvok09919821:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 3 to 12 percent slopesEflE2896384151dwqzok10719961:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesEflB1618384150dwqyok10719961:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 3 to 15 percent slopes2114784623416nxq6ok11319751:24000
Eufaula-Dougherty complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes225170623417nxq7ok11319751:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 8 to 20 percent slopesDoEF141816759011t7xbok11720071:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 8 to 20 percent slopesDoEF2123190767922131ok11919831:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula loamy fine sands, 8 to 20 percent slopesDrE2834384616dx6zok12319671:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesEuB2007384622dx75ok12319671:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes138918384672dx8sok12519751:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes122593384671dx8rok12519751:24000
Eufaula-Dougherty complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes117101384796dxdsok13319761:24000
Eufaula-Dougherty complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes101516384795dxdrok13319761:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 3 to 12 percent slopesEuC499384862dxgxok13719601:24000
Dougherty-Eufaula complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes239823850072tq7wok14919761:24000
Nobscot-Eufaula complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesNeD23685385285dxxkok15319611:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopesEuD2227362707d5f7tx02319711:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB172536319430n1ktx04119931:20000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesEuB569736344230n1ktx05119941:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes33436364815d7m7tx11319751:20000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, terrace 0 to 3 percent slopesPrA560365324d84ntx13919621:20000
Eufaula fine sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes143636367603dbj5tx21319781:20000
Eufaula fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes361088367749dbnwtx21719751:20000
Eufaula fine sandEu29301368231dc5ftx25319661:20000
Nimrod-Eufaula fine sandNe19231368241dc5rtx25319661:20000
Eufaula and Selden soils, 1 to 3 percent slopes, erodedEsB22522368230dc5dtx25319661:20000
Selden-Eufaula complex, severely erodedNf3983368242dc5stx25319661:20000
Eufaula fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesEuC1531368857dctmtx28119901:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesEuB26636918930n1ltx28919851:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesEuB64637028230n1ltx31319891:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopesEuE579370283df9mtx31319891:24000
Eufaula-Patilo complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes1820113707622zbmktx33719751:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopesEuD256390944f3t3tx36319791:24000
Eufaula loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesEuC1877037171330n1ltx39519961:24000
Eufaula fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesEuC4810373839dk0btx60019811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the EUFAULA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .