Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ERA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ERA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ERA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1090P018489OR031013Era7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.6333351,-121.0833359

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ERA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ERA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ERA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ERA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ERA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ERA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ERA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ERA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ERA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Era ashy sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes122595734347472mphor6181:24000
Meadowridge-Era complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes109534934348152mr9or6181:24000
Meadowridge-Agentia-Era complex, 35 to 60 percent north slopes038471634348242mqcor6181:24000
Era ashy sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes121451534376492mpgor6181:24000
Lickskillet-Era-Meadowridge complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes217403034349051sgvyor6181:24000
Searles-Meadowridge-Era complex, bouldery, 2 to 40 percent south slopes115296934376372mt0or6181:24000
Agentia-Era complex, 40 to 70 percent north slopes036264634349752mmsor6181:24000
Era cobbly ashy sandy loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes222223134376402mpjor6181:24000
Era ashy sandy loam, moist, 12 to 35 percent north slopes223120534374442mrror6181:24000
Era complex, moist, 2 to 40 percent north slopes163104234349932mtdor6181:24000
Era cobbly ashy sandy loam, 10 to 40 percent south slopes1796513434896wg1hor6181:24000
Era ashy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes09856034348762mtgor6181:24000
Meadowridge-Era-Searles complex, bouldery, 2 to 40 percent north slopes2084693434848wg3lor6181:24000
Era sandy loam, cobbly substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopes45A1032363724249mor62019921:24000
Era sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes44B87863715249bor62019921:24000
Era-Haystack complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes46B72663733249xor62019921:24000
Era soils, 8 to 40 percent slopesErE60006289323ftor66619701:31680
Era soils, 1 to 8 percent slopesErB39906289223fsor66619701:31680
Era sandy loam, cobbly substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopes56006286523dxor66619701:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ERA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .