Soil Data Explorer - ENET

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ENET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ENET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ENET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
102B	92P0722	92SD027015	Enet	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.0825005,-97.0016632
102C	40A2383	S1956SD099008	Enet	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.7527771,-96.8736115

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ENET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ENET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ENET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ENET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ENET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ENET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ENET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ENET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. SD-2012-03-15-56 | Jerauld County - September 1994

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Delmont-Ree-Canning association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

2. SD-2012-03-15-76 | Miner County - December 1984

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Egan-Huntimer-Trent and Arlo-Baltic associations (Soil Survey of Miner County, SD; 1984).

3. SD-2012-03-16-03 | Turner County - November 1982

   Pattern of soils in the Roxbury-Davis-Chaska and Delmont-Enet associations (Soil Survey of Turner County, SD; 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing ENET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DmB	10395	354841	2wkr4	sd003	1979	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DmA	2581	354840	2wkr3	sd003	1979	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	1624	354848	2wkrt	sd003	1979	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	13390	354570	2wkrt	sd005	1976	1:20000
Enet loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EnB	1147	354571	2xhdh	sd005	1976	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EdB	1654	418265	2wkr4	sd009	1981	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EdA	1630	418264	2wkr3	sd009	1981	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	EnA	103	418751	316sm	sd011	1995	1:24000
Enet-Delmont loams, 2 to 9 percent slopes	EnC	1180	355023	cxfc	sd023	1980	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EmA	765	355022	2wkrt	sd023	1980	1:20000
Arlo-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	AsA	267	355002	cxdp	sd023	1980	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DeB	128	417716	2wkr4	sd025	1992	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DeA	18	417715	2wkr3	sd025	1992	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DmB	849	445545	316sr	sd027	1995	1:24000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	Em	433	445559	316sm	sd027	1995	1:24000
Enet-Storla-Tetonka complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	EnB	198	445560	gymx	sd027	1995	1:24000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	11787	352914	2wkrt	sd035	1966	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EoA	1306	352915	2wkr3	sd035	1966	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EoB	850	352916	2wkr4	sd035	1966	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EdA	3461	354895	2wkr3	sd043	1979	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DlB	965	354889	2wkr4	sd043	1979	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LhB	29	354269	2wkr4	sd045	1973	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	BoA	712	355168	2wkrt	sd049	1981	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	WeA	2214	352685	2wkrt	sd059	1959	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Sw	1614	352680	2wkr4	sd059	1959	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	WgA	654	352687	2wkr3	sd059	1959	1:20000
Enet loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	WeB	652	352686	2xhdh	sd059	1959	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	3692	356428	2wkrt	sd073	1987	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EpB	2804	356429	2wkr4	sd073	1987	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DgA	796	356420	2wkr3	sd073	1987	1:20000
Enet loam, high precipitation, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnhA	332	3082541	2xhdl	sd079	1967	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	238	416494	2wkrt	sd079	1967	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DnA	2494	418023	2wkr3	sd087	1976	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EdA	9321	355397	2wkr3	sd097	1983	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DeB	1074	446022	316sr	sd099	1995	1:24000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DeA	797	446021	316sp	sd099	1995	1:24000
Enet-Dimo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EoA	358	446037	gz49	sd099	1995	1:24000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	EnA	336	446036	316sm	sd099	1995	1:24000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	EnA	1763	418322	316sm	sd101	1985	1:20000
Enet-Dimo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EoA	915	418323	g199	sd101	1985	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EdB	3210	354784	2wkr4	sd111	1978	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EcA	1453	354783	2wkrt	sd111	1978	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DeA	4083	356586	2wkr3	sd115	1997	1:24000
Delmont-Enet loams, high precipitation, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DlA	12013	3082507	2xhdj	sd125	1980	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, high precipitation, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DehB	4077	3082553	2xhdk	sd125	1980	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DeB	1059	418224	2wkr4	sd125	1980	1:20000
Enet loam, high precipitation, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnhA	523	3082539	2xhdl	sd125	1980	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DeA	360	418223	2wkr3	sd125	1980	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	142	418231	2wkrt	sd125	1980	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	EmA	632	453691	316sm	sd127	1974	1:20000
Enet and dempster complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EnB	452	453692	h737	sd127	1974	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	BwA	1747	354477	2wkrt	sd129	1975	1:20000
Enet loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	BwB	901	354478	2xhdh	sd129	1975	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EhA	1341	418078	2wkr3	sd135	1977	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EhB	944	418079	2wkr4	sd135	1977	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, high precipitation, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DlA	16	3082509	2xhdj	sd135	1977	1:20000
Delmont-Enet loams, high precipitation, 2 to 6 percent slopes	EhhB	6	3082555	2xhdk	sd135	1977	1:20000
Enet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	EnA	2706	417964	2wkrt	sd602	1975	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ENET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).