Soil Data Explorer - ENENTAH

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ENENTAH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ENENTAH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ENENTAH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
48A	98P0310	97CO049005	Enentah	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.2808952,-105.8362427

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ENENTAH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ENENTAH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ENENTAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ENENTAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ENENTAH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ENENTAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ENENTAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ENENTAH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ENENTAH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Rock outcrop-Rubble land-Enentah complex, 40 to 200 percent slopes	34	25	2407111	jzzt	co642	2012	1:24000
Enentah, landslide-Sambrito family-Haydenfork family, occasionally flooded complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes	65	11407	509373	k31d	co647		1:24000
Enentah, very stony-Slocum family complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes	41	8604	509340	k30b	co647		1:24000
Enentah family-Leroux complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes, extremely stony	54	1589	509354	k30s	co647		1:24000
Enentah very stony loam, 10 to 40 percent slopes	6	5995	506430	jzzg	co651	1999	1:24000
Enentah-Rubble land complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes	7	1352	506429	jzzf	co651	1999	1:24000
Rock outcrop-Rubble land-Enentah complex, 40 to 200 percent slopes	34	1348	506441	jzzt	co651	1999	1:24000
Ketchum, very stony surface-Enentah, extremely stony surface families, complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes	127AW	70756	3175647	2z449	id703		1:24000
Broad Canyon, very bouldery surface-Enentah, extremely bouldery surface, families, complex, 12 to 60 percent slopes	43B7AB	25675	3173423	2yy4z	id703		1:24000
Enentah, very bouldery surface-Ketchum, rubbly surface, families, complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes	43B7AH	19551	3173411	2yy4l	id703		1:24000
Kaina-Lag-Enentah, families, complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes	127BD	10978	3175644	2z446	id703		1:24000
Enentah family, very bouldery surface-Rubble land-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes	43B7AE	8108	3173419	2yy4v	id703		1:24000
Booneville family-Enentah family-Zeebar complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes	127AY	6363	3239012	2ztdl	id703		1:24000
Sweethollow, very bouldery surface-Enentah, extremely bouldery surface, families, complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes	43B7AF	4002	3173440	2yy5h	id703		1:24000
Enentah, extremely stony surface-Leighcan, extremely bouldery surface-Como families, complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes	127CA	2682	3239072	30mqv	id703		1:24000
Ketchum, very stony surface-Enentah, extremely stony surface families, complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes	127AW		3320465	2z449	id720		1:24000
Booneville family-Enentah family-Zeebar complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes	127AY		3320466	2ztdl	id720		1:24000
Enentah, extremely stony surface-Leighcan, extremely bouldery surface-Como families, complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes	127CA		3320430	30mqv	id720		1:24000
Ezbin, extremely stony surface-Enentah, rubbly surface-Charcoal, very stony surface, families, complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes	127CB		3320431	30mqw	id720		1:24000
Enentah, rubbly surface-Dailybasin-Marcel families, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	127CC		3320432	30mqx	id720		1:24000
Worock-Spearhead-Enentah families, complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes, extremely stony surface	127CL		3320441	30mqz	id720		1:24000
Lag, moderately deep-Shakespeare-Enentah families, complex, 20 to 65 percent slopes	127CR		3320447	30mrd	id720		1:24000
Worock-Spearhead-Enentah families, complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes, extremely stony surface	127CL	1532	3312445	30mqz	id752	1999	1:24000
Ketchum, very stony surface-Enentah, extremely stony surface families, complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes	127AW	1428	3239066	2z449	id752	1999	1:24000
Enentah, extremely stony surface-Leighcan, extremely bouldery surface-Como families, complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes	127CA	262	3312438	30mqv	id752	1999	1:24000
Lag, moderately deep-Shakespeare-Enentah families, complex, 20 to 65 percent slopes	127CR	192	3312450	30mrd	id752	1999	1:24000
Enentah, rubbly surface-Dailybasin-Marcel families, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	127CC	147	3312439	30mqx	id752	1999	1:24000
Ketchum, very stony surface-Enentah, extremely stony surface families, complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes	127AW	297	3239087	2z449	id763	1998	1:24000
Cundiyo, very stony-Enentah complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	CN	660	2934460	2whjv	nm678		1:24000
Enentah-Rock outcrop-Rubble land complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very stony	EHG	317	2934587	2wl29	nm678		1:24000
Como-Enentah families-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes	310	19938	157906	599r	wy656	2008	1:24000
Rock outcrop-Dystrocryepts-Enentah family complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	311	16049	157907	599s	wy656	2008	1:24000
Como-Enentah families, complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes	321	9111	157916	59b2	wy656	2008	1:24000
Eutrocryepts-Rubble land-Enentah family complex, 50 to 70 percent slopes	319	7103	157914	59b0	wy656	2008	1:24000
Frisco-Enentah families, complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes	350	6396	157876	598s	wy656	2008	1:24000
Enentah-Buell families-Eutrocryepts complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	314	4628	157909	599v	wy656	2008	1:24000
Enentah-Firada families, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes	327	1778	157873	598p	wy656	2008	1:24000
Tamarron-Enentah-Badwater families, complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes -- draft	336	23493	152012	535m	wy663	2012	1:24000
Enentah-Coldfeet families, complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes	346	13671	152015	535q	wy663	2012	1:24000
Enentah family-Inceptic Haplocryalfs-Rubble land complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes	325	12064	152005	535d	wy663	2012	1:24000
Enentah-Gralic families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes	333	11757	152009	535j	wy663	2012	1:24000
Telcher-Enentah families, complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	335	4967	152011	535l	wy663	2012	1:24000
Como-Enentah-Coldfeet families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes	324	1629	152004	535c	wy663	2012	1:24000
Enentah family-Lithic Cryorthents-Ezbin family, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes -- draft	423	1595	152038	536g	wy663	2012	1:24000
Tamarron-Enentah-Badwater families, complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes -- draft	336	2712	2611985	535m	wy723		1:24000
Enentah family-Lithic Cryorthents-Ezbin family, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes -- draft	423	57	2771631	536g	wy723		1:24000
Enentah-Gralic families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes	333	0	2925208	535j	wy723		1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ENENTAH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).