Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the EMELINE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of EMELINE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to EMELINE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
10392P0563S1992IA091003Emeline6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.75,-94.3486099
105X49-412C-1S1983IA097024Emeline2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.057351,-90.3402307

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the EMELINE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the EMELINE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EMELINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EMELINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with EMELINE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EMELINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EMELINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with EMELINE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IA-2010-09-09-23 | Webster County - 2008

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lester-Coland-Wadena association (Soil Survey of Webster County, Iowa; 2008).

  2. IA-2011-05-31-29 | Floyd County - 1995

    A cross section showing the parent material of some of the soils in Floyd County (Soil Survey of Floyd County, Iowa; 1995).

  3. IA-2011-06-01-05 | Jones County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kenyon-Rockton-Emeline association (Soil Survey of Jones County, Iowa; 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing EMELINE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Emeline loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes412G5504028912t3fjia01119771:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E4294028902t3flia01119771:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C2694028892t3fkia01119771:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C2154132562t3fkia01320011:12000
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C6124032392t3fkia01919781:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C9344034072t3fkia02319781:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E3684034082t3flia02319781:15840
Rock outcrop-Emeline complex, 18 to 60 percent slopes478G94113971251hwtkia03120081:12000
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E50913971152t3flia03120081:12000
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C16434038382t3fkia03319781:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E3134038392t3flia03319781:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C3914040382t3fkia03719891:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E1504040402t3flia03719891:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C29364050452t3fkia05519841:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E26964054262t3flia06119831:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C9304059272t3fkia06719891:15840
Emeline loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes412G6814059302t3fjia06719891:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E3534059292t3flia06719891:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes412D1160407501fp16ia09719881:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C845407500fp15ia09719881:15840
Emeline loam, 14 to 25 percent slopes412F418407502fp17ia09719881:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C11354081552t3fkia10519881:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E7444081562t3flia10519881:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E10054086352t3flia11319701:15840
Emeline loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes412G8214086362t3fjia11319701:15840
Rock outcrop-Emeline complex, 18 to 60 percent slopes478G34526064411hwtkia11319701:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C2164086342t3fkia11319701:15840
Emeline loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes412G4634093222t3fjia12319711:15840
Emeline loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes412G11514096772t3fjia13119711:15840
Emeline loam, 9 to 18 percent slopes412E5724096762t3flia13119711:15840
Emeline loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes412C1494096752t3fkia13119711:15840
Emeline-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes478G1504114942t3fmia17119891:15840
Gosport-Emeline-Ridgeton complex, 25 to 75 percent slopes413G230116123221r3rdia18720061:12000
Channahon-Emeline-Rockton complex, 25 to 50 percent slopesN575F171613849771hh5pmn03920051:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the EMELINE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .