Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the EFFIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of EFFIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to EFFIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
57UMN3139S1900MN0073139Effie2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.644249,-95.1197586
88UMN2449S1977MN0612449Effie2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.8530312,-93.733223
88UMN4226S1989MN1374226Effie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.7524452,-93.0402756

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the EFFIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the EFFIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EFFIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EFFIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with EFFIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EFFIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EFFIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with EFFIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing EFFIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Effie silt loam6169602397664fbswmn00719911:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A1633140632zvt8mn00719911:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A333140642zvt9mn00719911:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A4441232480212zvt8mn06119821:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesB606B3203832480202zvt7mn06119821:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A969032480222zvt9mn06119821:24000
Effie loam6162265398447fcm4mn06119821:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A1083833140312zvt8mn07719891:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A402533140322zvt9mn07719891:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesB606B124733140302zvt7mn07719891:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesF190B2768224079482ltnrmn61320161:24000
Effie-Hamre complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesF193A929824079512ltnvmn61320161:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesB606B105533140402zvt7mn61320161:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A62333140412zvt8mn61320161:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A5833140422zvt9mn61320161:24000
Ashlake-Suomi-Effie complex, MLRA 88, 1 to 4 percent slopesB24B417186144320gzkmn61720071:24000
Effie-Ashlake complex, MLRA 88, 0 to 2 percent slopesB23A151186144220gzjmn61720071:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesB606B241833140502zvt7mn62120061:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A184133140512zvt8mn62120061:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A36733140522zvt9mn62120061:24000
Ashlake-Suomi-Effie complex, MLRA 88, 1 to 4 percent slopesB24B224823053wmg3mn62120061:24000
Effie-Ashlake complex, MLRA 88, 0 to 2 percent slopesB23A20823046wmfwmn62120061:24000
Effie-Ashlake-Effie, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB616A12259333140612zvt8mn62520151:24000
Hamre-Tacoosh-Effie complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedB243A6886633140622zvt9mn62520151:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesB606B3724233140602zvt7mn62520151:24000
Effie-Hamre complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesF193A3090329438252pfv4mn62520151:24000
Ashlake-Effie complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesF190B2533929438222pftsmn62520151:24000
Effie, depressional-Hamre complex, mlra 57, 0 to 1 percent slopesA18A43072943750nl81mn62520151:24000
Effie-Ashlake complex, mlra 57, 0 to 3 percent slopesA15A34252943748nl7zmn62520151:24000
Ashlake-Suomi-Effie complex, mlra 57, 0 to 4 percent slopesA16B17072943754nl85mn62520151:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the EFFIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .