Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the EDALGO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of EDALGO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to EDALGO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
7479P0321S1979KS143002Edalgo7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1027794,-97.8222198
n/a16N0186S2015NE067500Edalgo7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.3899,96.86789

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the EDALGO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the EDALGO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EDALGO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EDALGO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with EDALGO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EDALGO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EDALGO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with EDALGO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-20-59 | Ellsworth County - February 1989

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Lancaster-Hedville-Harney association (Soil Survey of Ellsworth County, Kansas; 1989).

  2. KS-2012-01-24-08 | Marion County - December 1983

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Lancaser-Hedville association (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kansas; 1983).

  3. KS-2012-01-24-11 | McPherson County - April 1983

    Typical pattern of soils in the Lancaster-Hedville-Edalgo association (Soil Survey of McPherson County, Kansas; 1983).

  4. KS-2012-01-25-28 | Saline County - May 1992

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Wells-Crete-Lancaster association (Soil Survey of Saline County, Kansas; 1992).

  5. KS-2012-01-25-29 | Saline County - May 1992

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Lancaster-Hedville-Crete association (Soil Survey of Saline County, Kansas; 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing EDALGO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes3360624514546342tpw7ks02719831:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes336417914546352tpwjks02719831:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes336437113820292tpwjks02919721:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 7 to 15 percent slopes33652439213822092tpwkks05319851:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 15 to 40 percent slopes3366501213822082tpwlks05319851:24000
Edalgo loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes3352223913822072tpw9ks05319851:24000
Wells-Edalgo complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes34951981513821082r9ffks10519831:24000
Edalgo silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes33551175214292042tpwcks11319801:24000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, eroded3361112714292052tpwdks11319801:24000
Edalgo loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes335213914292032tpw9ks11319801:24000
Edalgo clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes33506814292022tpw8ks11319801:24000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes3360209913827712tpw7ks11519811:24000
Edalgo silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes335513513827702tpwcks11519811:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes33647610513821212tpwjks14319781:24000
Edalgo silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes3354148313821202tpwbks14319781:24000
Edalgo clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes33501613821192tpw8ks14319781:24000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, eroded33612414332302tpwdks15919711:24000
Edalgo-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes3367126411509522tpwmks16719801:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 15 to 40 percent slopes336638111509512tpwlks16719801:24000
Edalgo clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes33501131513821672tpw8ks16919891:24000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes33602011614548692tpw7ks20119881:24000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 11 to 20 percent slopes385649016910992tpwhne06720001:12000
Lancaster and Edalgo soils, 11 to 30 percent slopes41701169616918162tpw5ne09519701:20000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, eroded336141916917892tpwfne09519701:20000
Edalgo silty clay loam, 7 to 11 percent slopes385541316917902tpwgne09519701:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the EDALGO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .