Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the EBAL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of EBAL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to EBAL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
114A93P0188S1990IN119055Ebal6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2125015,-86.7458344
120BWS81091981IN175009Ebal2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.51295,-86.2890333
120BDU84021984IN037002Ebal2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4479111,-86.7175222
120BLW80052016IN093002Ebal2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9841889,-86.6104056
120BMO77012017IN105001Ebal3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.0593917,-86.6623611
120B84P0648S1984IN117002Ebal6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4472771,-86.4094238
120B84P0649S1984IN117003Ebal6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4681091,-86.3794174
120B92P0525S1992IN123501Ebal7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.0333939,-86.5491486
120B92P0530S1992IN123506Ebal7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.1355553,-86.4836121

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the EBAL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the EBAL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EBAL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EBAL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with EBAL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the EBAL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the EBAL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with EBAL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IN-2010-09-24-20 | Perry County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent materials of alluvial, stream terrace lacustrine and aeolian landforms adjacent to hills underlain with interbedded shale and limestone in Ohio River Valley (Soil Survey of Perry County, Indiana).

  2. IN-2010-09-24-21 | Perry County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent materials in the Adyeville-Ebal-Deuchars and Apalona associations (Soil Survey of Perry County, Indiana).

Map Units

Map units containing EBAL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Adyeville-Tipsaw-Ebal complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very rockyAccG139716525401sglrin02519701:20000
Wellston-Ebal-Adyeville complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely erodedWpmD348616525971sgnlin02519701:20000
Ebal-Deuchars-Kitterman complex, 12 to 24 percent slopes, severely erodedEabD335316525481sgm0in02519701:20000
Ebal-Deuchars-Kitterman complex, 12 to 24 percent slopes, erodedEabD231316525471sglzin02519701:20000
Wellston-Adyeville-Ebal silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedWppD213516525991sgnnin02519701:20000
Ebal-Wellston silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, erodedEfD272241615375f2win05519841:15840
Berks-Ebal complex, 15 to 60 percent slopesBcF65501615215f2cin05519841:15840
Gilpin-Ebal silt loams, 18 to 30 percent slopesGgE60691615465f35in05519841:15840
Ebal-Gilpin silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopesEcD6531615365f2vin05519841:15840
Gilpin-Tipsaw-Ebal complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, stonyGfcF779716774351t9htin06120071:12000
Ebal-Gilpin-Wellston silt loams, 10 to 22 percent slopes, erodedEbhD2410717039171v622in06120071:12000
Ebal-Gilpin-Wellston silt loams, 10 to 22 percent slopes, severely erodedEbhD3214417039181v623in06120071:12000
Ebal-Wellston silt loams, 12 to 24 percent slopes complexEbeE1249716515351sfkbin09319821:15840
Ebal silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedEaaC2370716514921sfhyin09319821:15840
Wellston-Adyeville-Ebal silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded complexWppD228416515121sfjlin09319821:15840
Ebal-Wellston silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded complexEbdD222316514931sfhzin09319821:15840
Adyeville-Ebal silt loams, 18 to 30 percent slopes complexAcjE3916515261sfk1in09319821:15840
Ebal-Wellston silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, erodedEbdD2320914430801kfmzin10119841:15840
Wellston-Adyeville-Ebal silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedWppD210914431181kfp6in10119841:15840
Ebal silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedEaaC21514430791kfmyin10119841:15840
Ebal-Wellston-Gilpin silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopesEdD8908535533kz88in10519791:15840
Ebal-Gilpin-Hagerstown silt loams, 18 to 25 percent slopesEbE5272535532kz87in10519791:15840
Wellston-Adyeville-Ebal silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedWppD24450614430121kfksin11719801:15840
Wellston-Ebal-Adyeville complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely erodedWpmD3661614430101kfkqin11719801:15840
Adyeville-Tipsaw-Ebal complex, 18 to 50 percent slopesAcgF414429591kfj2in11719801:15840
Ebal silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedEaaD21441659825kq8in11919971:12000
Adyeville-Tipsaw-Ebal complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very rockyAccG80319535667kzdlin12319971:12000
Ebal-Deuchars-Kitterman complex, 12 to 24 percent slopes, erodedEabD225164535727kzgjin12319971:12000
Ebal-Deuchars-Kitterman complex, 12 to 24 percent slopes, severely erodedEabD312487535728kzgkin12319971:12000
Gilpin-Berks-Ebal complex, 18 to 50 percent slopesGpF3544535486kz6rin17519841:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the EBAL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .