Soil Data Explorer - DUELM

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DUELM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DUELM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DUELM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
91A	UMN1662	S1973MN1451662	Duelm	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.5448608,-94.2127228

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DUELM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DUELM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the DUELM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the DUELM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DUELM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the DUELM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the DUELM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DUELM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MN-2010-09-13-03 | Wright County -

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Hubbard-Mosford association (Soil Survey of Wright County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing DUELM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Dp	621	395917	2w0lx	mn003	1972	1:15840
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	D17A	704	709874	2w0lx	mn009	2007	1:12000
Duelm loamy sand, Mississippi River Valley, 0 to 2 percent slopes	D91A	1997	2732674	2slmx	mn035	2009	1:24000
Urban land-Duelm complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	D31A	2567	435216	glw7	mn053	2001	1:12000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	D17A	1997	451598	2w0lx	mn053	2001	1:12000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	459	436637	2w0lx	mn057	1998	1:24000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	9719	400377	2w0lx	mn097	1987	1:20000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	4181	435677	2w0lx	mn111	1996	1:20000
Duelm variant, fine sandy loam	De	277	427959	gcb4	mn139	1988	1:20000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	3391	431473	2w0lx	mn141	1994	1:15840
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	5714	428115	2w0lx	mn145	1980	1:15840
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	8330	428523	2w0lx	mn153	1985	1:20000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	6048	428787	2w0lx	mn159	1987	1:20000
Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	260	799	433747	2w0lx	mn171	1998	1:12000
Duelm loamy sand	Du	373	422135	g588	wi109	1975	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DUELM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).