Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DRISCOLL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DRISCOLL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DRISCOLL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43A76-ID-29621976ID057004Driscoll4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6868611,-116.9171944
43A01P0253S2000WA063004Driscoll6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.538887,-117.2180557
902N0112S2001WA063001Driscoll7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.4858513,-117.2772141
904N0221S2003ID009003Driscoll6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.1738892,-116.9061127
904N1106S2004ID009004Driscoll7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.3448296,-116.9781189

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DRISCOLL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DRISCOLL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DRISCOLL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DRISCOLL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DRISCOLL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DRISCOLL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DRISCOLL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DRISCOLL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing DRISCOLL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 7 to 25 percent slopes8552024872532ph5zid05720131:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 10 to 20 percent slopes24j1325020742nxmid05720131:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes93631526629352mdm6id60619761:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes61411126629302dtzjid60619761:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3551026629791nvhgid60619761:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes367826629852kp7wid60619761:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes12027401795862nt9id61119941:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 10 to 20 percent slopes749780796892nxmid61119941:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes1217381795872ntbid61119941:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes366878796472nw8id61119941:24000
Driscoll silt loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes351533796462nw7id61119941:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes74j104679207qsrxid61119941:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes592256777317v2vrid61220031:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes1591270777319v2vtid61220031:24000
Driscoll silt loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes581134777318v2vsid61220031:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes355371115448061nvhgid62020131:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes363255515448121nvhnid62020131:24000
Driscoll silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes400162013898481hn7tid62020131:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes35698315448101nvhlid62020131:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes36758023739142kp7wid62020131:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes6141310922295052dtzjwa06320121:24000
Driscoll silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes61401584858862wcjwa06320121:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes604385122295042dtzhwa06320121:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes936369224251982mdm6wa06320121:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes935525224314642mm4bwa06320121:24000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes936721224252002mdm8wa06320121:24000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes93563124252012mdm9wa06320121:24000
Driscoll-Larkin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes61412926513772dtzjwa07519751:20000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes60431726513652dtzhwa07519751:20000
Larkin-Driscoll complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes93631126513822mdm6wa07519751:20000
Southwick-Driscoll complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes9356226513812mdm9wa07519751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DRISCOLL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .