Soil Data Explorer - DOGER

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DOGER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DOGER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DOGER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DOGER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DOGER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the DOGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the DOGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DOGER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the DOGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the DOGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DOGER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing DOGER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Doger loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	3164	9953	426948	gb8j	ne003	1975	1:20000
Doger fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes	3163	4933	426947	gb8h	ne003	1975	1:20000
Doger loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	3165	1913	426949	gb8k	ne003	1975	1:20000
Doger and Dunday loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes	3160	7783	1698837	2s81x	ne075	1973	1:24000
Doger and Dunday loamy fine sands, 3 to 9 percent slopes	3161	4337	1698838	2zbf5	ne075	1973	1:24000
Doger and Dunday loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes	3160	55	2219860	2s81x	ne161	1992	1:20000
Forestburg-Doger loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes	FrA	3771	354574	cwyw	sd005	1976	1:20000
Doger loamy fine sand	Dg	1877	354563	cwyj	sd005	1976	1:20000
Forestburg-Doger loamy fine sands, 3 to 6 percent slopes	FrB	1220	354575	cwyx	sd005	1976	1:20000
Doger loamy sand	Ma	739	352644	ctym	sd059	1959	1:20000
Doger loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	DeA	2144	354776	cx5d	sd111	1978	1:20000
Doger loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	DeB	786	354777	cx5f	sd111	1978	1:20000
Doger-Dunday loamy fine sands, 3 to 6 percent slopes	DgB	8782	352984	cv9l	sd121	1967	1:31680
Doger loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes	DfA	5709	352983	cv9k	sd121	1967	1:31680
Doger loamy fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes	DgB	45429	354385	cwrs	sd123	1975	1:20000
Dunday-Doger loamy fine sands, 3 to 9 percent slopes	DuC	18593	354388	cwrw	sd123	1975	1:20000
Doger-Elsmere complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	DmA	14000	354386	cwrt	sd123	1975	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DOGER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).