Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DIX soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DIX, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DIX were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
67A79P0072S1978NE123015DIX6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.8580322,-103.3610916
7285P026084NE033118Dix7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.2661095,-103.3566666

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DIX soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DIX series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DIX series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DIX series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DIX share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DIX series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DIX series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DIX, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CO-2011-05-27-12 | Phillips County - 1971

    Typical landscape of the Rago-Platner-Kuma association showing the major soils and the minor Wages, Eckley, and Dix soils (Soil Survey of Phillips County, Colorado; 1971).

  2. NE-2012-02-08-04 | Banner County - October 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Tripp-Alice association (Soil Survey of Banner County, Nebraska; October 1994).

  3. NE-2012-02-13-41 | Keith County - November 1995

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Sully-Dix-Tassel association (Soil Survey of Keith County, Nebraska; November 1995).

  4. NE-2012-02-13-56 | Morrill County - August 1985

    Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Tassel-Busher-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Morrill County, Nebraska; August 1985).

  5. NE-2012-02-13-58 | Morrill County - August 1985

    Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Tripp-Alice-Duroc association (Soil Survey of Morrill County, Nebraska; August 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing DIX as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dix-Eckley complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes25186809450535bkco07519741:24000
Dix-Altvan complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes2417225945042tlqbco07519741:24000
Wages-Eckley-Dix complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesWeE81459479135msco09519711:20000
Chappell and Dix sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesCdB17919477235m5co09519711:20000
Eckley-Dix-Blakeland complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes2689999511735z9co61719801:24000
Altvan-Dix complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes7844951772tlq8co61719801:24000
Dix soils, 6 to 40 percent slopes15954168115066417mc6ks06319741:24000
Bayard-Dix complex, 9 to 20 percent slopes13161080516924631tt4lne00719881:20000
Bayard-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes1315776316924621tt4kne00719881:20000
Dix sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes136824516924761tt50ne00719881:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes15061530616986552tlq7ne03319891:20000
Dix gravelly loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes15721142916986751v0lzne03319891:20000
Dix gravelly loam, 9 to 50 percent slopes1571848216986761v0m0ne03319891:20000
Dix-Sulco-Sarben complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes1576934116988821v0tnne10119901:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes1507812516988702tlq9ne10119901:20000
Satanta-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes1824651216989141v0vpne10119901:20000
Dix gravelly loam, 3 to 20 percent slopes1573434916988811v0tmne10119901:20000
Sulco-Dix complex, 9 to 20 percent slopes1836338816989171v0vsne10119901:20000
Tassel and Dix and Altvan soils, 9 to 30 percent slopes60231023416925591tt7pne10520041:24000
Dix complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes1570286716991601v13mne11119711:24000
Dix gravelly loam, 3 to 20 percent slopes157331322197232dhszne11119711:24000
Dix loamy coarse sand, 6 to 50 percent slopes15741499016926011tt91ne12319811:20000
Alice-Dix complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes5907794216925731tt84ne12319811:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes1506180916925752tlq7ne12319811:20000
Alice-Dix complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes590694816925721tt83ne12319811:20000
Alice-Dix complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes590591616925711tt82ne12319811:20000
Dix gravelly loam, 9 to 50 percent slopes157126522203862djhcne12319811:20000
Bayard-Dix complex, 9 to 20 percent slopes13168622203782djh3ne12319811:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes1507121416989542tlq9ne13519871:20000
Dix-Bayard complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes1575342816537331shv7ne15719651:20000
Dix complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes1570135316537371shvcne15719651:20000
Chappell-Dix complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes1375110716537321shv6ne15719651:20000
Alice-Dix complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes590666222276932ds32ne15719651:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes150620522276802tlq7ne15719651:20000
Dix loamy coarse sand, 6 to 50 percent slopes15744222276822ds2qne15719651:20000
Bayard-Dix complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes13151022276402ds1cne15719651:20000
Dix sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDsA68433336452zj4ysd01919701:24000
Dix-Chappell fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopesDcC3352352982cv9jsd12119671:31680
Schamber-Dix complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesGr1002352992cv9vsd12119671:31680
Dix soils, 9 to 18 percent slopesDbD3823354384cwrrsd12319751:20000
Chappell-Dix fine sandy loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesCnC3165354382cwrpsd12319751:20000
Dix fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDaA245354383cwrqsd12319751:20000
Dix complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesDcE105571046833hxwwy61519651:20000
Dix complex, 0 to 10 percent slopesDcD10341046823hxvwy61519651:20000
Chappell complex, 10 to 15 percent slopesCID8381046723hxjwy61519651:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes7351991048442tlq8wy62119801:24000
Dix-Altvan complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes15213291048032tlqbwy62119801:24000
Dix-Otero complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes1611421048043j1swy62119801:24000
Dix-Alice complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes6E93751048963j4rwy71519741:20000
Dix-Alice complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes6C9351048953j4qwy71519741:20000
Altvan-Dix complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes102181311049032tlq8wy72119941:24000
Dix-Altvan complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes12994581049302tlqbwy72119941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DIX soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .