Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DISHNO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DISHNO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DISHNO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
93A14N0285S2013MN137VOYA034Dishno6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties48.5152101,-93.0752068
93B97P0109S1996MI103001Dishno7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.5942497,-87.9377747

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DISHNO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DISHNO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DISHNO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DISHNO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DISHNO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DISHNO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DISHNO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DISHNO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-10-09 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Arcadian-Michigamme-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

  2. MI-2010-09-10-10 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Montreal-Paavola-Arcadian association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

  3. MI-2010-09-10-12 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Arcadian-Nipissing-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing DISHNO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, very stony369D296114560001kw2rmi05320071:24000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, very stony369C72714559991kw2qmi05320071:24000
Dishno-Tula-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes691D39714563481kwfzmi05320071:24000
Dishno-Tula-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes691B26914563471kwfymi05320071:24000
Gogebic-Dishno complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, rocky, very stony551B20014562431kwblmi05320071:24000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, very stony8369C1524858182pfppmi06119891:20000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, very stony8369D624858192pfpqmi06119891:20000
Dishno-Michigamme-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, very bouldery207D21272395165f868mi10319991:24000
Keewaydin-Dishno complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, rocky, bouldery133D17507395040f827mi10319991:24000
Dishno-Witbeck-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes, very bouldery184C9715395143f85kmi10319991:24000
Gogebic-Dishno cobbly silt loams, 6 to 18 percent slopes, rocky, very stony124D4962395012f81bmi10319991:24000
Keewaydin-Dishno complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, rocky, bouldery133B2527395039f826mi10319991:24000
Champion-Dishno complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, rocky, very stony140D2468395064f830mi10319991:24000
Champion-Dishno complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, rocky, very stony140B470395063f82zmi10319991:24000
Gogebic-Dishno cobbly silt loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes, rocky, very stony124B404395011f819mi10319991:24000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, very stony8369D92716749401t6xbmi13120071:24000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, very stony8369C10816749391t6x9mi13120071:24000
Montreal-Paavola-Dishno complex, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky, very bouldery173E19313435403gm28mi60520041:24000
Arcadian-Dishno-Rock outcrop complex, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes, very bouldery52E13744801446vwz3mi60520041:24000
Montreal-Paavola-Dishno complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky, very bouldery173C8787801609vx4cmi60520041:24000
Monteal-Dishno-Gratiot complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, rocky, very bouldery174B5086801608vx4bmi60520041:24000
Arcadian-Dishno-Rock outcrop complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes, very bouldery52C585435350gm0kmi60520041:24000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, very stony5369D42317028691v4z8wi00320061:12000
Dishno-Gogebic-Peshekee-Rock outcrop complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, very stony5369D223817007811v2sxwi05120061:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DISHNO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .