Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DEER CREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DEER CREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DEER CREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DEER CREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DEER CREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DEER CREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DEER CREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DEER CREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DEER CREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DEER CREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DEER CREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing DEER CREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Deer Creek cobbly loam, 6 to 25 percent slopesDbD3365482482j61yut60819811:24000
Deer Creek-Borvant complex, 2 to 25 percent slopesDcD1991482483j61zut60819811:24000
Deer Creek-Picayune association, steepDGG2786482893j6h6ut61219671:20000
Deer Creek loam, 30 to 60 percent slopesDCG879482892j6h5ut61219671:20000
Deer Creek-Watkins Ridge complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesDWD3286504231jxpjut62219671:24000
Watkins Ridge-Deer Creek complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesWND2392504312jxs4ut62219671:24000
Deer Creek-Watkins Ridge complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesDWC846504230jxphut62219671:24000
Deer Creek loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesDcA539504232jxpkut62219671:24000
Deer Creek loam, 3 to 10 percent slopesDcC456504233jxplut62219671:24000
Watkins Ridge-Deer Creek complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesWNC392504311jxs3ut62219671:24000
Deer Creek stony silt loam, high rainfall, 6 to 25 percent slopesDED11545482243j5t7ut62719711:24000
Deer Creek stony silt loam, 6 to 30 percent slopesDCD6435482242j5t6ut62719711:24000
Deer Creek stony silt loam, high rainfall, 25 to 40 percent slopesDEE5780482244j5t8ut62719711:24000
Deer Creek-Mower complex, 25 to 50 percent slopesDFF3445482245j5t9ut62719711:24000
Red Butte-Deer Creek association, 30 to 50 percent slopes, erodedREG28365484677j8brut64019671:20000
Deer Creek very cobbly loam, 3 to 20 percent slopes, erodedDLE24595484582j87put64019671:20000
Deer Creek cobbly loam, 3 to 30 percent slopes, erodedDKF22890484581j87nut64019671:20000
May Day-Deer Creek association, 3 to 20 percent slopesMIE1900484624j891ut64019671:20000
Maple Mountain-Deer Creek-Condie families complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, moist143A32432932zsdcut6451:24000
Deer Creek-Preussrange families complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes2536636331285130gvvut6451:24000
Deer Creek-Skylick families complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes253B3360331285330gvxut6451:24000
Deer Creek-Gabica families association, 10 to 60 percent slopes140625204nzkwut6491:24000
Deer Creek family, 8 to 30 percent slopes139625205nzkxut6491:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DEER CREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .