Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DECK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DECK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DECK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DECK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DECK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DECK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DECK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DECK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DECK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DECK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DECK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing DECK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Slaughterhouse-Deck complex, without serpentine, 30 to 60 percent slopes7553CO79531206161sgbwor60720181:24000
Deck-Eastpine complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7779CO45531206571sgh1or60720181:24000
Deck-Blackgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7319BO22431205981sg9dor60720181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7781DO15831206581sgh2or60720181:24000
Deck-Blackgulch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7339CO10131202741q71gor60720181:24000
Lemoncreek-Deck complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7330CO7231206051sg9qor60720181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7320CO6031205991sg9for60720181:24000
Lemonex-Uptmor-Deck complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7346BO1931206101sgb5or60720181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7782CO831206591sgh3or60720181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7320CO160331223841sg9for62620181:24000
Deck-Hondu-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7322CO160231223861sg9hor62620181:24000
Hondu-Deck-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7325CO103931223891sg9lor62620181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7782CO76231224371sgh3or62620181:24000
Lemoncreek-Deck complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7330CO69731223931sg9qor62620181:24000
Deck-Eastpine complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7779CO55131224351sgh1or62620181:24000
Lemonex-Uptmor-Deck complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7346BO49431224011sgb5or62620181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7781DO40231224361sgh2or62620181:24000
Blackgulch-Deck-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7305CO40131223791sg93or62620181:24000
Deck-Blackgulch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7339CO38031221231q71gor62620181:24000
Deck-Blackgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7319BO28131223831sg9dor62620181:24000
Lemonex-Uptmor-Deck complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes7346AO18831224001sgb2or62620181:24000
Deck-Analulu-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4085CO10133853472qczsor62620181:24000
Deck-Blackgulch complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes7319AO5231221081q6z2or62620181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes4084CO1633854732w6bfor62620181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes480E164234294392w6bfor6271:24000
Deck-Analulu-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes481E82134295782qczsor6271:24000
Deck-Analulu-Ruddley complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes481C75934319522w6bgor6271:24000
Deck, moist-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7782CO37934318452l17cor6271:24000
Hondu-Deck-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7325CO18434319321sg9lor6271:24000
Lemoncreek-Deck complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7330CO17234318391sg9qor6271:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7320CO17134319191sg9for6271:24000
Rock outcrop-Balder-Deck complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes491E12534322222wj7sor6271:24000
Deck-Hondu-Blackgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7322CO7134319331sg9hor6271:24000
Deck-Analulu-Ruddley complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes481D6434251682qczror6271:24000
Deck-Blackgulch complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes7319AO5534319301q6z2or6271:24000
Deck, moist-Eastpine complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7779CO2334318442l179or6271:24000
Lemonex-Uptmor-Deck complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7346BO1634318401sgb5or6271:24000
Deck-Blackgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7319BO1234319011sg9dor6271:24000
Suloaf-Lemonex-Deck complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes7318NO8224868711nxztor63120181:24000
Blackgulch-Deck-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7305CO2024868661sg93or63120181:24000
Deck-Analulu-Ruddley complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes481D8834247922qczror6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DECK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .