Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DALHART soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DALHART, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DALHART were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
7206N0851S2006KS171102Dalhart7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.355999,-100.8011703
77A91P066291KS129001ADalhart7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0699997,-101.8736115
77A91P066391KS129001BDalhart7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0699997,-101.8736115
77A91P066491KS129001CDalhart7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0699997,-101.8736115
77A85P0960S1985OK025003Dalhart7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.71203,-102.65825
77A93P0099S1992KS175003Dalhart6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1158333,-101.0111084

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DALHART soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DALHART series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DALHART series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DALHART series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DALHART share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DALHART series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DALHART series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DALHART, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-23-16 | Grant County - December 1969

    Relationships of soils in association 5 (Soil Survey of Grant County, Kansas; 1969).

  2. KS-2012-01-24-20 | Morton County - December 1963

    Geologic cross section of the western part of the county. (Based on plate 6 of "Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Morton Co., Kans." (6).) (Soil Survey of Morton County, Kansas; 1963.)

  3. KS-2012-01-25-34 | Scott County - December 1965

    An approximate geologic profile extending in an east-west direction across Scott County near Shallow Water (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).

  4. KS-2012-01-26-11 | Stanton County - December 1961

    Diagram of the Manter-Dalhart-Ulysses soil association in the valley of Bear Creek (Soil Survey of Stanton County, Kansas; 1961).

  5. KS-2012-01-26-14 | Stevens County - October 1961

    Geological cross section through the central part of Stevens County (Soil Survey of Stevens County, Kansas; 1961).

  6. NM-2012-02-14-02 | Harding County - November 1973

    Typical pattern of soils in association 8 in the north-central part of the county (Soil Survey of Harding County, New Mexico; November 1973).

  7. OK-2012-02-16-03 | Beaver County - August 1962

    Parent material and parent rock of most of the soils in Beaver County, and their position on the landscape (Soil Survey of Beaver County, Oklahoma; August 1962).

  8. OK-2012-02-16-09 | Cimarron County - June 1960

    Typical landscape in the central and eastern part of Cimarron County: Associations 1, 2, 3, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  9. OK-2012-02-16-30 | Ellis County - April 1966

    Major soils of associations 7, 8, and 10 (Soil Survey of Ellis County, Oklahoma; April 1966).

  10. OK-2012-02-16-47 | Harper County - June 1960

    A schematic drawing showing a normal pattern of soils formed on limy outwash. The typical slope range is given for each soil (Soil Survey of Harper County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  11. OK-2012-02-17-40 | Roger Mills County - August 1963

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 3, 4, and 5 (Soil Survey of Roger Mills County, Oklahoma; August 1963).

  12. OK-2012-02-17-54 | Texas County - July 1961

    Typical pattern of the soils in association 4, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).

  13. TX-2012-03-20-10 | Carson County - July 1962

    General relationship of the soils in Carson County (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  14. TX-2012-03-20-12 | Carson County - July 1962

    Several major soils of the Canadian River Valley of the Rolling Plains. The ranges in slope shown on this figure are those that exist where the figure was drawn (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  15. TX-2012-03-20-15 | Carson County - July 1962

    Soil toposequence of the escarpment separating the High Plains from the Rolling Plains (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  16. TX-2012-03-21-04 | Hansford County - June 1960

    Diagram showing typical locations of soil series and the underlying parent material (Soil Survey of Hansford County, TX; 1960).

  17. TX-2012-03-21-75 | Sherman County - July 1975

    Typical pattern of soils in the Sunray-Conlen association (Soil Survey of Sherman County, TX; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing DALHART as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dalhart loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopesDaB3141941873509co00919661:20000
Arabrab-Dalhart families complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes106009510574k494co67619831:24000
Eva-Optima-Dalhart complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes523159913817362w84qks02519801:24000
Eva-Optima-Dalhart complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes5231213804592w84qks05719621:24000
Eva-Optima-Dalhart complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes52312514587452w84qks08119651:24000
Eva-Optima-Dalhart complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes52312521113818092w84qks11919731:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes52203383813825932rgf4ks12919951:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes52192615613825922rgf3ks12919951:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes5217822213825902rgf1ks12919951:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5218449313825912rgf2ks12919951:24000
Dalhart-Eva complex loamy fine sands, 3 to 8 percent slopes5216428015423132rgf5ks12919951:24000
Eva-Optima-Dalhart complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes52313715813826242w84qks17519631:24000
Manter-Dalhart complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes52462606313826572y7z8ks17519631:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes52172174213826522rgf1ks17519631:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes52181823913826532rgf2ks17519631:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes52191670213826542rgf3ks17519631:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes5220352416904822rgf4ks17519631:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes5220747099168042rgf4ks18920051:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes52194397414738862rgf3ks18920051:24000
Dalhart-Eva complex loamy fine sands, 3 to 8 percent slopes5216239479168072rgf5ks18920051:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5218173239168032rgf2ks18920051:24000
Dalhart and Vorhees soils, 1 to 3 percent slopes52251146910175752y7yzks18920051:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes5217111579168022rgf1ks18920051:24000
Dalhart-Seelez association, gently slopingDB272507729k1bcnm00719741:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loamDa11245376336dmlwnm02119681:31680
Dalhart complex, severely erodedDb2025376337dmlxnm02119681:31680
Dalhart-Eva complex loamy fine sands, 3 to 8 percent slopesDhED2441431564942rgf5ok00720211:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesDlhB1807431012872rgf3ok00720211:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesDhtA703631012862rgf1ok00720211:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesDd1330403820582rgf3ok02519581:20000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesDa817193820552rgf1ok02519581:20000
Conlen-Dalhart complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesMd71080382064dtknok02519581:20000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesDb502953820562rgf2ok02519581:20000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, moderately erodedDc21980382057dtkfok02519581:20000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, moderately erodedDe7032382059dtkhok02519581:20000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesDaA819473849022rgf1ok13919591:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesDaB526043849032rgf2ok13919591:24000
Dalhart loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesDsB286173849042rgf3ok13919591:24000
Dalhart-Optima complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesDoB627194844423dj1tx19520071:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesDaB50983708082rgf2tx34119681:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesDaA32563708072rgf1tx34119681:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesDaA222543720982rgf1tx42119701:24000
Dalhart fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesDaB135983720992rgf2tx42119701:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DALHART soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .