Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CYNTHIANA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CYNTHIANA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CYNTHIANA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/a80KY-161-00680KY-161-006Cynthiana3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a96KY-015-00296KY-015-002Cynthiana3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a97KY-015-00797KY-015-007Cynthiana3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a99KY-011-01099KY-011-010Cynthiana1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CYNTHIANA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CYNTHIANA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CYNTHIANA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CYNTHIANA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CYNTHIANA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CYNTHIANA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CYNTHIANA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CYNTHIANA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-05 | Garrard and Lincoln Counties - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Lowell-Faywood-Cynthiana general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Garrard and Lincoln Counties, Kentucky; 2006).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-06 | Garrard and Lincoln Counties - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Shrouts-Beasley-Garlin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Garrard and Lincoln Counties, Kentucky; 2006).

  3. KY-2010-09-03-27 | Cumberland County - 1998

    Typical pattern of the soils in the Huntington-Elk-Nelse-Grigsby and Holston-Monongahela-Waynesboro general soil map units and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

  4. KY-2010-09-03-32 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Carpenter-Bledsoe-Berks general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  5. KY-2010-09-03-33 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Bledsoe-Gilpin general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  6. KY-2012-01-26-28 | Bourbon and Nicholas Counties - October 1982

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lowell-Faywood-Cynthiana map unit (Soil Survey of Bourbon and Nicholas Counties, Kentucky; October 1982).

  7. KY-2012-01-27-04 | Bullitt and Spencer Counties - September 1986

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Beasley-Faywood general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Bullitt and Spencer Counties, Kentucky; September 1986).

  8. KY-2012-01-27-06 | Bullitt and Spencer Counties - September 1986

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Faywood-Lowell general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Bullitt and Spencer Counties, Kentucky; September 1986).

  9. KY-2012-01-27-72 | Fleming County - October 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lowell-Faywood-Cynthiana soil map unit (Soil Survey of Fleming County, Kentucky; October 1993).

  10. KY-2012-01-30-12 | Harrison County - April 1968

    Major soils in association 2, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent material from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Harrison County, Kentucky; April 1968).

  11. KY-2012-01-30-13 | Harrison County - April 1968

    Major soils in association 3, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent material from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Harrison County, Kentucky; April 1968).

  12. KY-2012-02-01-06 | Madison County - March 1973

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Lowell-Faywood-Cynthiana-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Madison County, Kentucky; March 1973).

  13. KY-2012-02-01-09 | Madison County - March 1973

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Colyer-Weikert-Captina association (Soil Survey of Madison County, Kentucky; March 1973).

  14. KY-2012-02-01-10 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Carpenter-Garmon-Rohan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  15. KY-2012-02-01-11 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Trappist-Crider-Faywood general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  16. KY-2012-02-01-12 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lowell-Sandview-Faywood general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  17. KY-2012-02-01-13 | Mason County - September 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lowell-Faywood-Nicholson general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Mason County, Kentucky; September 1986).

  18. KY-2012-02-01-15 | Mason County - September 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Cynthiana-Faywood-Lowell general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Mason County, Kentucky; September 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing CYNTHIANA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, rocky, 20 to 40 percent slopes, erodedCyE22234017274971vzlqky01120061:12000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, very rocky, 6 to 20 percent slopes, erodedCyD2693317274961vzlpky01120061:12000
Rock outcrop-Cynthiana complex, 20 to 40 percent slopesRcE36414047941j4syky03320051:12000
Cynthiana-Faywood-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes, erodedCyF29765551438lhtbky05719911:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, rocky, 12 to 25 percent slopes, erodedFcD22015551449lhtpky05719911:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, rocky, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedFcC2530551448lhtnky05719911:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, very rocky, 12 to 35 percent slopes, erodedCyE222150552705lk46ky06919891:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedCyC22887552704lk45ky06919891:20000
Cynthiana very stony silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, erodedChD213077551783lj5gky09719651:15840
Cynthiana very rocky clay, 20 to 30 percent slopes severely erodedCrE311305551787lj5lky09719651:15840
Cynthiana very stony clay, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely erodedCnD310277551786lj5kky09719651:15840
Cynthiana very stony silty clay loam, 20 to 30 percent slopesChE28970551784lj5hky09719651:15840
Fairmount and Cynthiana extremely rocky soils, 20 to 30 percent slopesFcE1233551798lj5yky09719651:15840
Fairmount and Cynthiana extremely rocky soils, 30 to 50 percent slopesFcF1216551799lj5zky09719651:15840
Cynthiana very stony silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedChC2991551782lj5fky09719651:15840
Cynthiana very stony clay, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedCnC3643551785lj5jky09719651:15840
Cynthiana-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 30 percent slopesCyE1658413978621hxlbky15119681:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopesuFcrF280213978502yksyky15119681:20000
Faywood-Lowell-Cynthiana complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyuFlE279613979102x5k4ky15119681:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyFcE211720552336ljr9ky15519861:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes, erodedCyF29310552329ljr2ky15519861:20000
Eden-Cynthiana complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes, eroded, rockyEeE23355552331ljr4ky15519861:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, very rocky, 12 to 30 percent slopes, erodedCyE213600548923lf66ky16119831:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood silty clay loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedCnC23150548922lf65ky16119831:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes, erodedFcE13425550522lgvsky17319831:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood-Beasley complex, 30 to 60 percent slopesCyF7830551581lhyyky18519751:20000
Cynthiana-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesCyF2063548860lf45ky20919741:15840
Cynthiana rocky silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesChD396548859lf44ky20919741:15840
Cynthiana flaggy silty clay loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCyF15245552029ljfdky60319681:15840
Cynthiana flaggy silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesCyD236552028ljfcky60319681:15840
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, very rocky, 6 to 20 percent slopesCnD10662552075ljgwky60419781:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, very rocky, 20 to 35 percent slopesCnE3057552076ljgxky60419781:20000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 12 to 30 percent slopesFlE18525550989lhbvky60819831:20000
Faywood-Lowell-Cynthiana complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyuFlE258855577612x5k4ky61620041:24000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyFeD223540552948lkd1ky61819931:12000
Shrouts-Cynthiana complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded, rockySfD38266552995lkfkky61819931:12000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyCyF27496552936lkcnky61819931:12000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded, rockyFeC24912552947lkd0ky61819931:12000
Shrouts-Garlin-Cynthiana complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes, severely eroded, very rockySgF32146552996lkflky61819931:12000
Cynthiana-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesCyF18915551951ljbwky61919781:15840
Cynthiana silty clay loam, very rocky, 6 to 20 percent slopesChD1740551950ljbvky61919781:15840
Faywood-Cynthiana-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopesuFcrF110545507032yksyky62319851:20000
Faywood-Lowell-Cynthiana complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyuFlE285431584422x5k4ky62319851:20000
Faywood-Lowell-Cynthiana complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyuFlE220085508262x5k4ky63419891:20000
Cynthiana-Faywood complex, rocky, 20 to 35 percent slopes, erodedCnE23757551830lj6zky63719891:12000
Faywood-Cynthiana complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes, erodedFyD21612551839lj78ky63719891:12000
Cynthiana flaggy silty clay loam, 10 to 35 percent slopes, eroded, rockyCyE2556524255kljgtn01319931:24000
Armuchee silt loam, very steep phase (Cynthiana)Al700525060kmcftn05919541:15840
Armuchee silty clay loam, eroded rolling phase (Cynthiana)An648525062kmchtn05919541:15840
Armuchee silty clay loam, eroded hilly phase (Cynthiana)Am337525061kmcgtn05919541:15840
Armuchee silty clay loam, eroded steep phase (Cynthiana)Ao316525063kmcjtn05919541:15840
Armuchee silt loam, steep phase (Cynthiana)Ak275525059kmcdtn05919541:15840
Armuchee silt loam, hilly phase (Cynthiana)Ah97525058kmcctn05919541:15840
Cynthiana flaggy silty clay loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCyE10761528538kqzmtn60219731:15840
Cynthiana flaggy silty clay loam, 5 to 20 percent slopesCyD1171528537kqzltn60219731:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CYNTHIANA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .