Soil Data Explorer - CUTHBERT

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CUTHBERT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CUTHBERT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CUTHBERT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
133B	40A4628	73TX347001	CUTHBERT	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	31.4699993,-94.3833313
133B	82P0497	82TX423003	Cuthbert	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.4916649,-95.476387
133B	11N0039	S2009TX419003	Cuthbert	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	31.6699677,-94.1400604

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CUTHBERT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CUTHBERT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUTHBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUTHBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CUTHBERT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUTHBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUTHBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CUTHBERT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. FL-2012-04-25-01 | Gadsden County - January 1961

   Main geologic formations and other topographic features in a segment of Gadsden County, and the positions of soils in some soil series (Soil Survey of Gadsden County, Florida; January 1961).

2. FL-2012-04-26-27 | Washington County - May 1965

   Geologic formations of Washington County and the position of most soil series (Soil Survey of Washington County, Florida; May 1965).

3. MS-2012-04-27-06 | Tippah County - February 1966

   Distribution and pattern of major soils in Ruston-Cuthbert-Providence association (Soil Survey of Tippah County, Mississippi; February 1966).

4. TX-2010-11-03-36 | Houston County - 2002

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Cuthbert-Kirvin-Lilbert general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Houston County, Texas; 2002).

5. TX-2010-11-03-74 | Marion and Cass Counties -

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Cuthbert-Bowie-Kirvin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion and Cass Counties, Texas).

6. TX-2010-11-04-15 | San Augustine and Sabine Counties -

   Cuthbert-Tenaha-Bowie association (Soil Survey of San Augustine and Sabine Counties, Texas).

7. TX-2012-03-19-04 | Angelina County - February 1988

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Sacul-Cuthbert-Kirvin map unit (Soil Survey of Angelina County, TX; 1988).

8. TX-2012-03-21-05 | Harrison County - October 1994

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Cuthbert-Bowie-Kirvin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Harrison County, TX; 1994).

9. TX-2012-03-21-07 | Harrison County - October 1994

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Lilbert-Warnock-Wolfpen general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Harrison County, TX; 1994).

10. TX-2012-03-21-29 | Leon County - July 1989

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Wolfpen-Pickton-Cuthbert general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Leon County, TX; 1989).

11. TX-2012-03-21-76 | Smith County - July 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wolfpen-Pickton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Smith County, TX; 1993).

12. TX-2012-03-21-77 | Smith County - July 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Redsprings-Cuthbert-Elrose general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Smith County, TX; 1993).

13. TX-2012-03-21-78 | Smith County - July 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bowie-Cuthbert-Kirvin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Smith County, TX; 1993).

Map Units

Map units containing CUTHBERT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Bowie, Lakeland, and Cuthbert soils, 8 to 12 percent slopes	BwD	48421	328110	c0f6	al003	1961	1:20000
Bowie, Lakeland, and Cuthbert soils, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BwF2	23876	328112	c0f8	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert, Bowie, and Sunsweet soils, 8 to 12 percent	CuD	18577	328127	c0fr	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert, Bowie, and Sunsweet soils, 12 to 17 percent slopes, eroded	CuE2	12472	328128	c0fs	al003	1961	1:20000
Bowie, Lakeland, and Cuthbert soils, 5 to 8 percent slopes	BwC	7277	328109	c0f5	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CtC	4270	328123	c0fm	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CtB	4128	328122	c0fl	al003	1961	1:20000
Bowie, Lakeland, and Cuthbert soils, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BwD2	3554	328111	c0f7	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes	CtD	1296	328124	c0fn	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert, Bowie, and Sunsweet soils, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CuC	873	328126	c0fq	al003	1961	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 12 to 17 percent slopes	CtE	453	328125	c0fp	al003	1961	1:20000
Lakeland and Cuthbert soils, 12 to 30 percent slopes	LbE	22133	328994	c1bq	al045	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert, Boswell, and Eustis soils, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CdE	10800	328971	c19z	al045	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, eroded, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CcE2	6250	328969	c19x	al045	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, eroded, sloping	CcD2	3944	328968	c19w	al045	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy clay, severely eroded, 8 to 30 percent slopes	CbE3	2280	328967	c19v	al045	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert, Boswell, and Eustis soils, eroded, sloping	CdD2	251	328970	c19y	al045	1958	1:20000
Lakeland and Cuthbert soils, eroded, gently sloping	LbC2	236	328993	c1bp	al045	1958	1:20000
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded	RxD2	18937	329505	c1w6	al057	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	RxC2	5873	329503	c1w4	al057	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes	RxD	5609	329504	c1w5	al057	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes	RxC	1697	329502	c1w3	al057	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes (luverne)	CsC	5594	329548	c1xl	al059	1962	1:15840
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes (luverne)	CsD	1649	329549	c1xm	al059	1962	1:15840
Cuthbert and Ruston soils, 10 to 15 percent slopes (luverne) (smithdale)	CuD	1559	329552	c1xq	al059	1962	1:15840
Cuthbert sandy clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded (luverne)	CtE3	1354	329551	c1xp	al059	1962	1:15840
Cuthbert sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded (luverne)	CtC3	685	329550	c1xn	al059	1962	1:15840
Cuthbert, Lakeland, and Boswell soils eroded, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CkE2	13680	330900	c3b6	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert soils severely, eroded, 8 to 30 percent slopes	ChE3	2927	330897	c3b3	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert, Lakeland, and Boswell soils severely eroded, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CkE3	2908	330901	c3b7	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert, Lakeland, and Boswell soils, eroded, 2 to 12 percent slopes	CkD2	2478	330898	c3b4	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert, Lakeland, and Boswell soils, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CkE	1105	330899	c3b5	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, eroded, gently sloping phase	CgC2	801	330896	c3b2	al101	1958	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes	17	2236	3179348	lym8	ar019	1983	1:20000
Cuthbert-Orangeburg complex, 12 to 17 percent slopes	COE	240	324620	bwsm	ga095	1965	1:20000
Cuthbert-Orangeburg complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes	COC2	45	324619	bwsl	ga095	1965	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GAC2	3170	324965	bx4r	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GAC	2520	324964	bx4q	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert sands, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	GAB2	2235	324963	bx4p	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert sands, 2 to 5 percent slopes	GAB	2205	324962	bx4n	ga283	1962	1:20000
Sawyer, Norfolk, and Cuthbert loamy sands, 2 to 5 percent slopes	SlB	1900	324998	bx5t	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert coarse sands, 2 to 5 percent slopes	GBB	1360	324967	bx4t	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert sands, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GAD2	870	324966	bx4s	ga283	1962	1:20000
Gilead, Lakeland, and Cuthbert coarse sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GBC	780	324968	bx4v	ga283	1962	1:20000
Sawyer, Norfolk, and Cuthbert loamy sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	SlC2	780	325001	bx5x	ga283	1962	1:20000
Sawyer, Norfolk, and Cuthbert loamy sands, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	SlB2	765	324999	bx5v	ga283	1962	1:20000
Sawyer, Norfolk, and Cuthbert loamy sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes	SlC	475	325000	bx5w	ga283	1962	1:20000
Cuthbert, Dulac, and Ruston soils, 12 to 35 percent slopes (sweatman, providence and smithdale)	CrE	93720	331831	c497	ms013	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert, Dulac, and Ruston soils, 12 to 35 percent slopes. severely eroded (sweatman, providence and smithdale)	CrE3	24538	331832	c498	ms013	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert-Dulac and Ruston soils, 8 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded (sweatman, providence and smithdale)	CrD3	5026	331830	c496	ms013	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert, Dulac, and Ruston soils, 8 to 12 percent slopes (sweatman, providence and smithdale)	CrD	1643	331829	c495	ms013	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert-Ruston association, hilly (sweatman, smithdale)	CrF	16653	567835	m1w8	ms043	1965	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert association, hilly (smithdale, sweatman)	RcF	11611	567884	m1xv	ms043	1965	1:15840
Cuthbert-Ruston complex, 12 to 17 percent slopes, eroded (sweatman, smithdale)	CxE2	2675	567842	m1wh	ms043	1965	1:15840
Cuthbert-Ruston complex, 12 to 17 percent slopes (sweatman, smithdale)	CxE	1796	567841	m1wg	ms043	1965	1:15840
Ruston and Cuthbert soils, 12 to 17 percent slopes, eroded (smithdale and sweatman)	RsE2	8995	333202	c5qg	ms095	1963	1:15840
Ruston and Cuthbert soils, 12 to 17 percent slopes (smithdale- sweatman)	RsE	6896	333201	c5qf	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes (sweatman)	CtC	1677	333156	c5nz	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert silty clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded (sweatman)	CuC3	1217	333158	c5p1	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert silty clay loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded (sweatman)	CuD3	1096	333159	c5p2	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes (sweatman)	CtB	451	333155	c5ny	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert silt loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded (sweatman)	CtD2	238	333157	c5p0	ms095	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert and Providence soils, 12 to 35 percent slopes, eroded	CpF2	2130	568311	m2cm	ms107	1961	1:24000
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta-Association, steep (smithdale, sweatman sweatman)	RuF	12968	334222	c6sc	ms139	1963	1:15840
Wilcox-Cuthbert association, steep (wilcox, sweatman)	WcF	7034	334228	c6sk	ms139	1963	1:15840
Wilcox-Cuthbert association, moderately steep, severely eroded (wilcox, sweatman)	WcE3	5614	334227	c6sj	ms139	1963	1:15840
Wilcox-Cuthbert association, moderately steep (wilcox, sweatman)	WcE	2744	334226	c6sh	ms139	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert association, moderately steep, eroded (smithdale, sweatman)	RsE2	2471	334219	c6s8	ms139	1963	1:15840
Wilcox-Cuthbert association, steep, severely eroded (wilcox, sweatman)	WcF3	1727	334229	c6sl	ms139	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert-Shubuta association, moderately steep, eroded (smithdale, sweatman, sweatman)	RuE2	1175	334221	c6sb	ms139	1963	1:15840
Ruston-Cuthbert association, moderately steep (smithdale, sweatman)	RsE	1058	334218	c6s7	ms139	1963	1:15840
Cuthbert stony soils, 5 to 20 percent slopes	KrF	8283	575150	m9h7	tx001	1970	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtD	6475	575189	2tljm	tx005	1984	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CtF	2641	575190	30cql	tx005	1984	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slop es	CuD	894	575191	m9jk	tx005	1984	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	Cf	19567	575326	30n27	tx073	1949	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, strongly sloping, eroded	Cg	2533	575327	m9ny	tx073	1949	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	Ce	864	575325	30n26	tx073	1949	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtE	21754	375380	2tljm	tx161	1986	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slo pes	CvF	5196	375381	dlm2	tx161	1986	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slo pes, very stony	CzG	2321	375383	dlm4	tx161	1986	1:24000
Cuthbert soils, graded, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CxE	1820	375382	dlm3	tx161	1986	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CbE	43850	576425	2tljm	tx203	1989	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CgE	20292	576426	2tljn	tx203	1989	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CgF	1582	576427	mbtf	tx203	1989	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes	7	45852	367641	2s62z	tx213	1978	1:20000
Cuthbert very gravelly fine sandy loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes	8	8588	367642	dbkf	tx213	1978	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtE	32071	575495	2tljm	tx225	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CtG	1470	575496	30cql	tx225	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CuE	894	575497	2tljn	tx225	1994	1:24000
Tenaha-Cuthbert complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes	TcE	35719	369238	dd6x	tx289	1985	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes	CuE	31547	369182	2tlk9	tx289	1985	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes, stony	CxE	792	369183	dd54	tx289	1985	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes	16	55593	575624	m9zj	tx347	1976	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes	17	2031	575625	m9zk	tx347	1976	1:24000
Cuthbert stony fine sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes	18	1113	575626	m9zl	tx347	1976	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes	Lv	2509	575698	2tlk9	tx365	1971	1:20000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CbE	59204	578208	2tljm	tx401	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtE	7873	578211	2tljn	tx401	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CbG	1331	578209	30cql	tx401	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes, stony	CsG	271	578210	mdny	tx401	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CbE	8767	575749	2tljm	tx419	2002	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CgE	1999	575775	2tljn	tx419	2002	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CtG	1409	575752	30cql	tx419	2002	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes, stony	CsG	565	756350	td1d	tx419	2002	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly clay loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes, graded	CrG	245	575733	2y11n	tx419	2002	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes	CfE	80458	575791	2tlk9	tx423	1987	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes	CgE	15801	575792	mb4y	tx423	1987	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, graded, 3 to 8 percent slopes	CuC	3664	575794	mb50	tx423	1987	1:24000
Cuthbert-Urban land complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	CrE	2616	575793	mb4z	tx423	1987	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes	CuE	22475	373039	2s62z	tx467	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes	CvE	837	373040	dj5k	tx467	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, graded, 3 to 8 percent slopes	CxC	240	373042	dj5m	tx467	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony	CwF	114	373041	dj5l	tx467	1994	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes	CfE	40264	576042	2s62w	tx499	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes	CgE	9768	576043	mbf1	tx499	1993	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes	CsE	53656	576091	2s62w	tx603	1984	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, 15 to 40 percent slopes	CuF	9195	576092	30cqm	tx603	1984	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes	CbE	113533	576142	2s62w	tx608	1981	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, 15 to 40 percent slopes	CrF	6659	576144	30cqm	tx608	1981	1:24000
Cuthbert-Urban land complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes	CcE	1080	576143	mbj8	tx608	1981	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtE	69597	576486	2tljm	tx616	2004	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CuE	65589	576487	2tljn	tx616	2004	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CrF	7075	576549	mbyc	tx616	2004	1:24000
Cuthbert and Redsprings soils, 15 to 40 percent slopes, stony	CrG	4405	576545	mby7	tx616	2004	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CtE	38758	1894776	2tljm	tx619	2007	1:24000
Cuthbert fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	CtG	4516	1894777	30cql	tx619	2007	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	CuE	3650	1894755	2tljn	tx619	2007	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, stony	CtS	418	1894784	21lp2	tx619	2007	1:24000
Cuthbert gravelly clay loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes, graded	CrG	16	1894817	2y11n	tx619	2007	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CUTHBERT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).