Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CUSHEET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CUSHEET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CUSHEET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CUSHEET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CUSHEET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUSHEET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUSHEET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CUSHEET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUSHEET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUSHEET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CUSHEET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CUSHEET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rentsac-Cusheet complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes43117731068512qmgfco6481:24000
Rentsac-Cusheet-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes443831068562tz4nco6481:24000
Delpoint-Cusheet complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes8663365739312czwy6301:24000
Polaris-Cusheet complex, 7 to 30 percent slopes8653365737312g4wy6301:24000
Cusheet-Polaris complex 5 to 30 percent slopes8643365736312g2wy6301:24000
Cusheet-Delpoint-Whitesage complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes8633365735312g1wy6301:24000
Jemdilon-Cusheet complex, 7 to 25 percent slopes8613365733312fywy6301:24000
Seminoe-Cusheet complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes73429598582wsxkwy6301:24000
Cusheet-Seminoe complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes8603365732312fzwy6301:24000
Delpoint-Cusheet complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes8593365731312fxwy6301:24000
Polaris-Cusheet-Parchin complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes8483365717312fpwy6301:24000
Cusheet-Polaris complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes8473365715312fmwy6301:24000
Kayso-Cusheet complex 1 to 7 percent slopes8453365713312flwy6301:24000
Cusheet-Seminoe complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes71730038472x7bpwy6301:24000
Acel-Cusheet complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes8753365748312gbwy6301:24000
Rentsac-Cusheet complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes4311696125314462qmgfwy6301:24000
Rentsac-Cusheet-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes443336728284402tz4nwy6301:24000
Bonhigh-Cusheet-Figuorsand family, complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes22031141014737701lgkzwy6351:24000
Cusheet family-Roto complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes4201694822337002dzbvwy6351:24000
Foreright-Cusheet complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes5602248714755861ljgkwy6351:24000
Bonhigh-Cusheet-Mantlemine complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes -- draft63191112029702432wwq6wy7231:24000
Cusheet-Hawkdepth complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes -- draft6308463629702312wwq4wy7231:24000
Mantlemine, calcareous-Mantlemine-Cusheet complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes -- draft6307413529702322wwqfwy7231:24000
Emelle-Mussel-Cusheet complex, 1 to 20 percent slope7110350624855592pffbwy7231:24000
Craighigh-Cusheet complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes6311219329702362wwq8wy7231:24000
Cusheet-Blackleaf complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes6106199629250752wdhswy7231:24000
Gompers-Cusheet-Craighigh complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes6312181729702372wwq9wy7231:24000
Cusheet-Ulric complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes6225152129250622wdhcwy7231:24000
Cusheet-Bluemod complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes630961629702342wwq5wy7231:24000
Cusheet family-Roto complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes420158425145692dzbvwy7231:24000
Cusheet-Rootel family-Zagplat complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes411432224982ztm8wy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CUSHEET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .