Soil Data Explorer - CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

This figure is not available.

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Cumulic Cryaquolls, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Aq	895	1606989	1qy6c	co023	2009	1:24000
Cumulic Cryaquolls, clay, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CwC	1053	472831	hw0m	co628	2008	1:24000
Cumulic Cryaquolls, 2 to 5 percent slopes	26	2247	498290	jqhw	co637	1986	1:24000
Cumulic Cryaquolls, nearly level	25	30757	497848	jq1m	co649	1977	1:24000
Cumulic Cryaquolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes	6	1267	512678	k6h0	co653	2000	1:24000
Typic Cryaquents-Cumulic Cryaquolls complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	62	481	512734	k6jt	co653	2000	1:24000
Cumulic Cryaquolls, nearly level	4	3500	497309	jph7	co690	1974	1:24000
Typic Haplocryolls, Cumulic Haplocryolls, and Cumulic Cryaquolls, frequently ponded, soils, 0 to 15 percent slopes	67	4722	2770038	2sdl7	nm672		1:24000
Sedimentary Moraines, Big Sagebrush-Silver Sagebrush-Willow Complex	3323	1386	151846	5308	wy662	1998	1:24000
Sedimentary Bottoms, Willow Complex	3511	1192	151857	530m	wy662	1998	1:24000
Sedimentary Floodplains, Meadow-Willow Complex	3114	972	151841	5303	wy662	1998	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CUMULIC CRYAQUOLLS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).