Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CRUZE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CRUZE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CRUZE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/aAD-s081961-OH001-S08Cruze2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aRO-0861961-OH141-086Cruze3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aHO-0241983-OH073-024Cruze4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CRUZE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CRUZE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRUZE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRUZE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CRUZE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRUZE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRUZE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CRUZE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-17 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny and Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map units. The Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny general soil map unit is along the Tug and Lavista Forks of the Big Sandy River and their major tributaries, and the Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map unit is on the mountains (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-31 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Jessietown-Muse-Rohan general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  3. KY-2012-01-26-19 | Bath County - September 1963

    Typical landscape in a river valley and the relative position of the principal soils (Soil Survey of Bath County, Kentucky; September 1963).

  4. OH-2010-09-29-23 | Ross County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Cruze-Rossmoyne-Shelocta general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Ross County, Ohio; 2003).

Map Units

Map units containing CRUZE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesBlD18134188468121855ky06320071:12000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 6 to 12 percent slopesBlC540188468021854ky06320071:12000
Cruze silt loam, 3 to 15 percent slopesCrC1538557787lqf4ky61620041:24000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesBlD16756550891lh7pky64019961:24000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 6 to 12 percent slopesBlC729550890lh7nky64019961:24000
Wellston-Cruze complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesWfC9801723275s9yoh04519981:12000
Shelocta-Cruze complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesSfD7991723075s99oh04519981:12000
Shelocta-Cruze complex, 25 to 40 percent slopesSfE1381723085s9boh04519981:12000
Shelocta-Cruze-Weikert association, steepSgE7714205621jp6loh07119731:15840
Shelocta-Cruze silt loams, 25 to 40 percent slopesScE1861513980981hxtyoh07319861:15840
Shelocta-Cruze silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesScD1690613980971hxtxoh07319861:15840
Wellston-Cruze silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesWfC1354913981041hxv4oh07319861:15840
Shelocta-Cruze silt loams, 40 to 70 percent slopesScF307013980991hxtzoh07319861:15840
Cruze silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCtC93813980691hxt0oh07319861:15840
Cruze silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesCrD314605211l0sloh07919811:15840
Shelocta-Cruze complex, 25 to 40 percent slopesSfE26699500rgwjoh12719841:15840
Shelocta-Cruze complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesSfD1699499rgwhoh12719841:15840
Shelocta-Cruze-Weikert association, steepSgE82816890171tpkfoh13119841:15840
Cruze silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCwE59516889981tpjtoh13119841:15840
Cruze silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedCwC235116889971tpjsoh13119841:15840
Cruze silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCwE371961708625qspoh14119971:15840
Shelocta-Cruze-Weikert association, steepShE339701709605qwvoh14119971:15840
Cruze silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesCwD146081708615qsnoh14119971:15840
Cruze silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedCwC237551708605qsmoh14119971:15840
Shelocta-Cruze silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesScD89114818501lqzmoh16319981:15840
Shelocta-Cruze silt loams, 25 to 40 percent slopesScE20614818511lqznoh16319981:15840
Cruze silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopesCwD35536370l048oh16319981:15840
Cruze silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCwE12536371l049oh16319981:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CRUZE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .