Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CROSSPLAIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CROSSPLAIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CROSSPLAIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CROSSPLAIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CROSSPLAIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CROSSPLAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CROSSPLAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CROSSPLAIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CROSSPLAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CROSSPLAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CROSSPLAIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2010-11-01-17 | Spink County - 2009

    Pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Hand-Ethan-Bonilla and Northville-Farmsworth-Durrstein associations (Soil Survey of Spink County, South Dakota; 2009).

  2. SD-2012-03-14-03 | Bon Homme County - January 1983

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Clarno-Crossplain-Davison association (Soil Survey of Bon Homme County, SD; 1983).

  3. SD-2012-03-14-04 | Bon Homme County - January 1983

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Clarno-Ethan-Bonilla association (Soil Survey of Bon Homme County, SD; 1983).

  4. SD-2012-03-14-15 | Clark County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Clarno-Bonilla-Ethan association (Soil Survey of Clark County, SD; 1999).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-58 | Jerauld County - September 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Ethan-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

  6. SD-2012-03-15-65 | Kingsbury County - November 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Clarno-Bonilla-Ethan association (Soil Survey of Kingsbury County, SD; 1997).

  7. SD-2012-03-15-77 | Miner County - December 1984

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Bonilla-Crossplain association (Soil Survey of Miner County, SD; 1984).

  8. SD-2012-03-15-79 | Miner County - December 1984

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Stickney association (Soil Survey of Miner County, SD; 1984).

  9. SD-2012-03-16-01 | Turner County - November 1982

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Crossplain-Davison association (Soil Survey of Turner County, SD; 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing CROSSPLAIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Clarno-Crossplain-Davison complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCnA556814182542wkqcsd00919811:20000
Bonilla-Crossplain complexBr2333418250g16ysd00919811:20000
Crossplain-Tetonka complexCt500417709g0nhsd02519921:20000
Davison-Crossplain complexDa345417714g0nnsd02519921:20000
Plankinton-Crossplain complexPr9966356456cyxlsd07319871:20000
Crossplain-Tetonka complexCt9729417467g0dpsd07719921:20000
Davison-Crossplain complexDc2768417471g0dtsd07719921:20000
Clarno-Crossplain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCo876864180182wkqbsd08719761:20000
Crossplain clay loamCk15960418017g0zfsd08719761:20000
Clarno-Crossplain-Davison complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCfA58024180152wkqcsd08719761:20000
Crossplain-Dudley complexCr5548418019g0zhsd08719761:20000
Hand-Davison-Crossplain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHdA49044180302yygnsd08719761:20000
Davison-Crossplain clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesDd45418046g10csd08719761:20000
Clarno-Crossplain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCgA291743553882wkqbsd09719831:20000
Crossplain-Tetonka complexCt22063355392cxt8sd09719831:20000
Davison-Crossplain clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesDd3236446020gz3rsd09919951:24000
Davison-Crossplain clay loamsDc4357418312g18ysd10119851:20000
Crossplain-Tetonka complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesCt3218356582cz1nsd11519971:24000
Clarno-Crossplain-Davison complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCkA416864182152wkqcsd12519801:20000
Crossplain clay loamCr3802418219g15ysd12519801:20000
Clarno-Crossplain-Davison complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCkA509944180672wkqcsd13519771:20000
Clarno-Crossplain-Stickney complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesChA2942418066g110sd13519771:20000
Bonilla-Crossplain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesBnA1077418059g10ssd13519771:20000
Prosper and Crossplain complexPs14496417992g0ymsd60219751:20000
Clarno-Crossplain-Davison complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCeA109944179452wkqcsd60219751:20000
Crossplain-Harps complexCt3407417949g0x7sd60219751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CROSSPLAIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .