Soil Data Explorer - CRAIGSVILLE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CRAIGSVILLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CRAIGSVILLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CRAIGSVILLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
125	08N0190	07TN650938	Craigsville	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.53375,-84.7324444
125	85KY-095-002	85KY-095-002	Craigsville	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.8706322,-83.4323807
127	88PA105012	1988PA105012	Craigsville	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.6736111,-77.7744444

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CRAIGSVILLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CRAIGSVILLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRAIGSVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRAIGSVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CRAIGSVILLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRAIGSVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRAIGSVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CRAIGSVILLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. PA-2010-09-30-09 | Clinton County - 2007

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material throughout the Deep Valleys Section (Soil Survey of Clinton County, Pennsylvania; 2007).

2. TN-2010-11-02-06 | Cumberland County - 2006

   The pattern of soils and parent material in the Jefferson-Varilla-Shelocta general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Tennessee; 2006).

3. TN-2010-11-02-29 | Overton County - 2005

   The relationship of soils and landscapes in the Lily-Gilpin and Gilpin-Shelocta-Bouldin general soil map units (Soil Survey of Overton County, Tennessee; 2005).

4. WV-2010-11-08-01 | Clay County - 2005

   The typical pattern of soils and parent material in the southern part of the county (Soil Survey of Clay County, West Virginia; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing CRAIGSVILLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CgA	150	2481373	2p929	ga015	2013	1:12000
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CvB	1030	562929	lws0	ga648	2001	1:12000
Craigsville-Philo complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded	Cr	4377	552517	ljy4	ky051	1994	1:24000
Craigsville-Philo complex, occasionally flooded	Cr	4064	552111	ljj1	ky638	1989	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, very stony, frequently flooded	CrA	2557	2401230	2llp1	md001	2009	1:12000
Craigsville cobbly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, very stony, occasionally flooded	CsA	1772	2401122	2llkk	md001	2009	1:12000
Craigsville cobbly fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, occasionally flooded	CsB	1452	2401123	2llkl	md001	2009	1:12000
Craigsville-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CuB	489	2401124	2llkm	md001	2009	1:12000
Barbour-Craigsville complex	Bb	298	2405615	2lr7h	pa027	1975	1:20000
Craigsville gravelly loam	Cr	35	2405621	2lr7p	pa027	1975	1:20000
Barbour-Craigsville complex	Bb	3898	543884	l7yn	pa035	2002	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly loam	Cr	3740	543955	l80y	pa035	2002	1:24000
Craigsville-Buchanan complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	CrB	2882	1591044	1qdm0	pa051	2005	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam	Cq	67	1591091	1qdnj	pa051	2005	1:24000
Craigsville-Wyoming complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	9B	24	296393	9yf2	pa089	1975	1:20000
Craigsville-Wyoming complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	9B	1901	297253	9z9t	pa103	1995	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded	CrA	5312	2991235	2wsk6	pa105	1953	1:24000
Craigsville-Wyoming complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	9B	15	319823	bqsw	pa115	1968	1:20000
Craigsville-Wyoming complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	9B	41	319874	bqvj	pa127	1977	1:20000
Craigsville-Buchanan complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	CrB	1064	621314	nvjd	pa129	2003	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly loam	Cr	17	1413900	1jg8p	pa607	1986	1:20000
Craigsville-Pope complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	Cw	463	1887379	21bz6	tn001	1978	1:15840
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CsB	88	526447	knt5	tn019	2000	1:24000
Ealy-Craigsville complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	EcB	884	523861	kl3r	tn035	1998	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	8	1637	2395914	2lf4k	tn059	1954	1:15840
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, frequently flooded	Cs	2488	526525	knwp	tn091	2000	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly loam, occasionally flooded	Cv	683	843238	x9g7	tn133	2003	1:24000
Ealy-Craigsville complex, occasionally flooded	Ec	809	728818	sgd8	tn143	2003	1:24000
Ealy-Craigsville complex, rarely flooded	EcB	47	1473550	1lgbw	tn145	2005	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	8	438	2401317	2llrv	tn171	1980	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CsB	961	1689640	1tq6j	tn179	1955	1:15840
Craigsville gravelly fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, bouldery, occasionally flooded	Cr	7583	524771	km23	tn606	2001	1:24000
Craigsville loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	17	2110	516313	2xxxp	va003	1981	1:15840
Craigsville very cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded	11A	1879	136703	4l7s	va009	2004	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam	28	9156	517639	kcn1	va015	1978	1:15840
Craigsville fine sandy loam	27	4022	517633	kcmv	va015	1978	1:15840
Craigsville fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	5B	1631	2399857	2lk7r	va051	2008	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded	12A	11	1914760	228gg	va063	2007	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam	10	2447	521056	kh68	va069	1983	1:15840
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded	17A	636	1670485	1t28m	va077	2006	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam	Cv	2027	516885	kbvq	va079	1983	1:15840
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ad	1559	516916	2w06f	va113	1967	1:15840
Craigsville soils	10	3033	517070	kc1p	va121	1980	1:15840
Craigsville very cobbly loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	11A	3979	136819	4lcj	va125	1992	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, frequently flooded	12A	2712	517150	kc48	va139	1995	1:20000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Sa	1953	517466	2w06f	va157	1958	1:20000
Craigsville-Unison complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes, very stony	StB	901	517468	2w06j	va157	1958	1:20000
Craigsville cobbly fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, frequently flooded	21B	5973	518369	kddl	va165	1980	1:20000
Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	18B	2515	522136	kjb3	va185	1996	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	14	373	518809	kdvs	va187	1980	1:15840
Craigsville fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	20B	683	2507490	2q7pm	va195	2010	1:24000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently flooded	3	3396	2525223	2qm0n	va606		1:24000
Craigsville-Urban land complex	527	270	3025796	2xd6h	va820		1:12000
Craigsville fine sandy loam	27	131	3025797	2xd5h	va820		1:12000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam-Urban land complex	528	25	3025798	2xd6j	va820		1:12000
Craigsville cobbly sandy loam	28	1	3025799	2xd5j	va820		1:12000
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam	Cr	1150	513051	k6w1	wv007	1990	1:24000
Pope-Craigsville complex	Px	4770	516106	kb1l	wv015	1998	1:24000
Craigsville gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes	Cv	1233	515113	k90k	wv101	1992	1:24000
Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam	Cr	5535	1155538	17sff	wv620	2005	1:24000
Pope-Craigsville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	PvA	85	2248428	2fgny	wv621	2010	1:12000
Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, extremely stony, rarely flooded	CxA	370	2427098	2mglh	wv622	2010	1:12000
Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, extremely stony, rarely flooded	CxA	9	2497758	2mglh	wv623	2010	1:12000
Pope-Craigsville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	PvA	5104	2453197	2nbrd	wv705	2009	1:24000
Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded	CvA	2335	2453202	2nbrk	wv705	2009	1:24000
Pope-Craigsville complex	Pr	3829	2514104	k7m1	wv767	2011	1:20000
Craigsville gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes	Cv	2443	2593444	2qdqb	wv767	2011	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CRAIGSVILLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).