Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CRACKERCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CRACKERCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CRACKERCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CRACKERCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CRACKERCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRACKERCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRACKERCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CRACKERCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRACKERCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRACKERCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CRACKERCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CRACKERCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO29025938691qzfpor60419881:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO28525938871r0f5or60419881:24000
Olot-Crackercreek-Lowerbluff complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5913AO327231202351nxyvor60720181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1791BO153931204041qzz9or60720181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4980BO144031205101r19ror60720181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5887CO132531205601r2bqor60720181:24000
Olot-Bennettcreek-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5967BO109331205851r2n2or60720181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1721CO79231201772z9for60720181:24000
Sharpridge-Crackercreek complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes3475AL74731204621r05por60720181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5016BO65431205221r1bdor60720181:24000
Sharpridge-Crackercreek complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes3475BL51431204631r05ror60720181:24000
Crackercreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5968CO45231205861r2n4or60720181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5016AO38131205211r1bcor60720181:24000
Dunstan-Humarel-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3486CO31431204721r07ror60720181:24000
Limberjim-Crackercreek-Terrodd complex, landslide, 0 to 45 percent slopes5776BL25931207201shxqor60720181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4980CO8731205111r19sor60720181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4980AO3331205091r19qor60720181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, mass failure, 0 to 15 percent slopes5016AM2731207161shxgor60720181:24000
Crackercreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5968CO571031223721r2n4or62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1721CO332331220672z9for62620181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4980BO325231223241r19ror62620181:24000
Olot-Bennettcreek-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5967BO298931223711r2n2or62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1721BO186931222121qzsror62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes1737CO182831221271qcw9or62620181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4980AO169831223231r19qor62620181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5016AO144531223371r1bcor62620181:24000
Crackercreek-Btree complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3345BO118331224701shmfor62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1791BO111831222191qzz9or62620181:24000
Larabee-Olot-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1798BO96731222201qzzcor62620181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5016BO76231223381r1bdor62620181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1788AO56631222181qzz7or62620181:24000
Sharpridge-Crackercreek complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes3475AL45131222651r05por62620181:24000
Crackercreek-Btree complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3345AO38531224691shmdor62620181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek-Lowerbluff complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5913AO38131220921nxyvor62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1721AO26631222111qzsqor62620181:24000
Larabee-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4980CO25631223251r19sor62620181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek-Lowerbluff complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5913BO11931223611r2jqor62620181:24000
Limberjim-Crackercreek-Terrodd complex, landslide, 0 to 45 percent slopes5776BL7233854371shxqor62620181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, mass failure, 0 to 15 percent slopes5016AM4331224841shxgor62620181:24000
Sharpridge-Crackercreek complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes3475BL3631222661r05ror62620181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5887CO3431223581r2bqor62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO631222781r0f5or62620181:24000
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO531222041qzfpor62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO634324371711r0f5or63120181:24000
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO470724957341qzfpor63120181:24000
Klickson-Crackercreek-Kamela complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5712CO82624372491q71cor63120181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek-Lowerbluff complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5913AO34324374141nxyvor63120181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1721CO24024864672z9for63120181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1791BO23124370831qzz9or63120181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1721AO7524370781qzsqor63120181:24000
Olot-Larabee-Crackercreek complex, mass failure, 15 to 30 percent slopes5016BM6724868321r1bfor63120181:24000
Olot-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5887CO3824375751r2bqor63120181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1791BO25231215111qzz9or64819771:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1721CO18031214972z9for64819771:24000
Limberjim-Crackercreek-Terrodd complex, landslide, 0 to 45 percent slopes5776BL7631215351shxqor64819771:24000
Crackercreek stony silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes22407694212b7dwa60319841:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CRACKERCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .