Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COYOTEFLATS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COYOTEFLATS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COYOTEFLATS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COYOTEFLATS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COYOTEFLATS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COYOTEFLATS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COYOTEFLATS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COYOTEFLATS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COYOTEFLATS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COYOTEFLATS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COYOTEFLATS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing COYOTEFLATS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Coyoteflats loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes233D3824509472n8dtmt60520071:24000
Coyoteflats loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes133B1328116774371t9hwmt61220111:24000
Varney-Coyoteflats complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes133C8718798346vsr3mt61220111:24000
Coyoteflats, stony-Deepone complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes137C70321907908221bfmt61220111:24000
Dyce, very stony-Coyoteflats-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes40E534814688001l9dnmt61220111:24000
Coyoteflats loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes233D40171883940217d8mt61220111:24000
Dyce, very stony-Coyoteflats-Mannixlee, rarely flooded complex, 1 to 25 percent slopes440E228216723851t47xmt61220111:24000
Trimad, extremely stony-Coyoteflats, rubbly-Trimad complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes200D106623830782kzshmt61220111:24000
Brockway-Coyoteflats, stony-Trudau complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes63C77522478082fg0ymt61220111:24000
Bronec-Coyoteflats complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony286E33124099922lwspmt61220111:24000
Trimad, extremely stony-Coyoteflats, rubbly-Trimad complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes200D14131628342kzshmt61420121:24000
Varney-Coyoteflats complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes854B4225232344z2rmt62420211:24000
Varney, stony-Coyoteflats, very stony complex, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes955C433314876411ly0fmt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats, very stony-Beaverell complex, cool, 0 to 4 percent slopes153B322915374601nlvhmt63720141:24000
Fortlogan-Coyoteflats-Cabbart complex, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes268C239615292351nb95mt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats cobbly loam, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes754C22471480724z2jmt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats-Crago complex, cool, 1 to 4 percent slopes654B16171480624z26mt63720141:24000
Varney-Coyoteflats complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes854B15181480794z2rmt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats cobbly loam, cool, 0 to 2 percent slopes754B14141480714z2hmt63720141:24000
Assinniboine-Coyoteflats complex, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes49C113315368101nl5jmt63720141:24000
Varney-Coyoteflats complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes854C9141480804z2smt63720141:24000
Varney-Coyoteflats complex, cool, 0 to 4 percent slopes155B90415370621nlfnmt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats-Fortlogan-Nebies, very stony, complex, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes855C80014870241lxcjmt63720141:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesB40831709282wxmlwy6031:24000
Coyoteflats-Amalia complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes221531709262wxkwwy6031:24000
Twinadams-like, stony-Coyoteflats, very stony-Birney, very bouldery complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes241732090402zdq4wy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft-Yamacall complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes32524834482pc77wy6291:24000
Rangecreek-Coyoteflats-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes551229118842w7hswy6291:24000
Coyoteflats gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes544029119132w7jmwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Chinatown complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes222629119172w7jrwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Amalia complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes221529690452wxkwwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft complex, 10 to 25 percent slopes240829690932wxmlwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Tymosling, stony-Bondoe, stony complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes533031368812yppkwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Crago-like-Cambarge-like complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes250531709162z1yqwy6291:24000
Foreleft-like-Bronec, very stony-Coyoteflats, very bouldery complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes944331709982z20ywy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Tymosling, very bouldery-Ratsnest-like complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes590531710042z214wy6291:24000
Foreleft-Colstrip-like-Coyoteflats complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes548332030322zbqpwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Delpoint complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes547932030422zbr1wy6291:24000
Coyoteflats, stony-Geohrock-Pachel complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes945032030582zbrnwy6291:24000
Dunlap-like-Coyoteflats-Udecide-like complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes523332030842zbshwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Amalia-Bronec complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes241832066352zc4lwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Pinehill complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes235032504762zv71wy6291:24000
Tridell-Badland-Coyoteflats complex, 8 to 60 percent slopes945632532752ztjnwy6291:24000
Pylon, stony-Coyoteflats complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes814341046331g8jwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats-Raghorn complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes811341046631g8mwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats sandy loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes747341047431g8ywy6301:24000
Foresand-Coyoteflats-Standing Elk complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes749341047731g8zwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats-Bonhigh complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes751341049431g9qwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats-Whitesage-Beavwan complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes130430190352xcd1wy6301:24000
Buddsoft-Bronec-Coyoteflats complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes130630190382xcd3wy6301:24000
Coyoteflats fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes8513365722312fnwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats-Creed complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes890341044431g7gwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats loam, 0 to 10 percent slopes43646726178342rb2wwy6301:24000
Coyoteflats loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes2226915624824512pb62wy6351:24000
Coyoteflats-Spang complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes54211729190486621y59wy6351:24000
Twinadams-like, stony-Coyoteflats, very stony-Birney, very bouldery complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes241732505162zdq4wy65620081:24000
Coyoteflats-Amalia-Bronec complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes241832505172zc4lwy65620081:24000
Fogarty-Coyoteflats-Foreright complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes272829252812wdk7wy7231:24000
Coyoteflats-Weed complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes -- draft5436193725154432qcstwy7231:24000
Coyoteflats loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes -- draft511A368503378jwt0wy7231:24000
Zagplat-Bonhigh-Coyoteflats complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes90530174322xbrmwy7371:24000
Coyoteflats-Bonhigh-Hawkdepth family, complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes431132224322zjttwy7371:24000
Hangmans-Coyoteflats-Bonhigh family, complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes34321271426119442qstmwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COYOTEFLATS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .