Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COUSHATTA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COUSHATTA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COUSHATTA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
131C11N0009S2010LA081002Coushatta7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties31.9940278,-93.3633056

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COUSHATTA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COUSHATTA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COUSHATTA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COUSHATTA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COUSHATTA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COUSHATTA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COUSHATTA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COUSHATTA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing COUSHATTA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sharkey-Commerce-Coushatta association, frequently floodedSm84185564205ly35ar04119681:20000
Coushatta complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesCoA3741564190ly2par04119681:20000
Coushatta silt loam812645564878lyswar66019751:20000
Coushatta soils, occasionally flooded910320564879lysxar66019751:20000
Coushatta-Urban land complex10309564830lyrbar66019751:20000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNd3618817160712s5kxla00919811:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNr1713517160722tgl1la00919811:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, occasionally floodedNw676017151351vkqyla00919811:24000
Coushatta silt loam, occasionally floodedNo478017151341vkqxla00919811:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCsA73015710252s5kxla01520051:24000
Urban land-Coushatta complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesUCA590315922501qfvxla01520051:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCtA20685710262tgl1la01520051:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCsA1657328056842s5kxla01720131:24000
Urban land-Coushatta complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesUCA350228057462ssy4la01720131:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCtA327528056852tgl1la01720131:24000
Coushatta-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesCUA17128057592ssykla01720131:24000
Coushatta silt loamNo352317224061vt9hla02519831:24000
Coushatta silt loam, gently undulating, occasionally floodedNw225317238751vvtwla02919831:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNd249424047442s5kxla04319821:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNo102724047472tgl1la04319821:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNd6332224048272s5kxla07919731:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNw1597424048312tgl1la07919731:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCs474017206632s5kxla08119731:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCt158217206642tgl1la08119731:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely flooded151372571204m5cyok02319771:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded192155571401m5l9ok07919811:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely flooded171550571399m5l7ok07919811:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded18829571400m5l8ok07919811:24000
Coushatta loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded, overwashed20254571403m5lcok07919811:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely floodedCs3206571145m5b1ok08919701:24000
Coushatta silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely floodedLrA5927571894m636ok13519661:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely floodedLsA1171571895m637ok13519661:24000
Oklared-Coushatta complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedYh1085571928m649ok13519661:24000
Coushatta silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedLsB841571896m638ok13519661:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COUSHATTA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .